On 19 May 2011 20:50, Serguey Zefirov sergu...@gmail.com wrote:
The solution... I think that some ratings, like used directly by ###
packages/projects and indirectly by ### would be nice, but not much.
Maybe my reverse dependencies mirror of hackage could be useful here:
2011/5/19 Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Simon Meier iridc...@gmail.com wrote:
The core problem that drove me towards this solution is the abundance
of different IntX and WordX types. Each of them requiring a separate
Write for big-endian, little-endian,
2011/5/20 Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com:
On 19 May 2011 10:53, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Long term we'd like to switch bytestring over
from ForeignPtr to ByteArray#, if possible. There are currently some
technical obstacles to such a switch
BTW I'm working with Roman
it can involve several qualified imports and time researching
ByteStrings/Lazy ByteStrings/ByteString.Char8
Evan is right, the right way is to use the text package (plus, it is part of
the platform and is simple to use), or at least the utf8-string package
(encode/decode functions). I personnaly
2011/5/20 Henning Thielemann schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de:
Simon Meier schrieb:
There are many providers of Writes. Each bounded-length-encoding of a
standard Haskell value is likely to have a corresponding Write. For
example, encoding an Int32 as a big-endian, little-endian, and
Am 20.05.2011 00:00, schrieb Daniel Peebles:
I don't think there's really a clear solution to that though, other
than gently encouraging collaboration and scoping out of existing work
before starting new work. But people generally hate working with other
people's code, so I doubt that'll have
What's stopping it from being put on the official hackage? I use it quite a
lot to find well established packages and/or example code, and am quite fond
of it. But it is only visible when you know that this exists.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Roel van Dijk vandijk.r...@gmail.comwrote:
On
On 20 May 2011 12:46, Markus Läll markus.l...@gmail.com wrote:
What's stopping it from being put on the official hackage? I use it quite a
lot to find well established packages and/or example code, and am quite fond
of it. But it is only visible when you know that this exists.
Poor timing. I
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 20:33, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
Ok, I'll bite.
To all the people who look at Hackage, see that there are 6 different
libraries for processing Unicode text files, and claim that this is somehow
a *good* thing, I offer the above essay as a
466
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
That's correct - I haven't yet got a stable solution for using ghci with
wxHaskell - Jeremy
On 18 May 2011 20:33, Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
Last I heard, wx still had the problem of crashing its host the second time
one opens a window (which is typical in ghci). And last I heard,
On 19 May 2011 14:01, Heinrich Apfelmus apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
Conal Elliott wrote:
Last I heard, wx still had the problem of crashing its host the second
time
one opens a window (which is typical in ghci). And last I heard, Jeremy
O'Donoghue (cc'd) was exploring solutions but had
On 19 May 2011 00:03, Eric Y. Kow eric@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 15:06:02 -0400, Tom Murphy wrote:
Is there a way to build an installer that would make this process easier?
I've sent a pull request to the maintainer of homebrew.
Hopefully it should then just be a matter
Hi Simon,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Simon Meier iridc...@gmail.com wrote:
Write achieves this separation, but it has some costs which I'm not
entirely comfortable with.
First, it leads to lots of API duplication. For every type (e.g. Word)
we want to be able serialize we have two
On 20 May 2011 02:48, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Felipe Almeida Lessa
felipe.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:23 PM, John Lask jvl...@hotmail.com wrote:
A general problem with strategic response is they underestimate the
effort
Hey now.. maybe so, but this thread is an interesting one.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Prolly noted already but the original presumption is false.
The optimal and right thing would be if there was an evolutionary
set in each functional area from which you could choose and
a common framework in which any selection from that area
could work.
Otherwise seems likes a purposeless
On 5/20/11 8:35 AM, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
I would like to suggest, quite seriously, that the Haskell community
try to come to a consensus about supporting a single Haskell GUI, with
a view to distribution in the HP. Obviously my vote is for wxHaskell,
but I'm quite prepared to loose the
:)
--
--
Regards,
KC
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
So we can get this show on the road. Pun intended. :D
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:20 PM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote:
:)
--
--
Regards,
KC
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
2011/5/20 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Simon Meier iridc...@gmail.com wrote:
Write achieves this separation, but it has some costs which I'm not
entirely comfortable with.
First, it leads to lots of API duplication. For every type (e.g.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 20:39, Gregory Crosswhite
gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
On 5/20/11 8:35 AM, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
I would like to suggest, quite seriously, that the Haskell community try
to come to a consensus about supporting a single Haskell GUI, with a view to
distribution
Note that it is supposed to be possible to build gtk2hs with gtk+osx,
which will not use X11 but use the native OS X GUI. I've not been able
to get this to work, but it's been a while since I tried. The Haskell
wiki mentions it doesn't support Glade, but does support Cairo. If
this were to
What am I doing wrong in the last line of main? If I comment out the last line
of main, my program prints the map (mp) that is created. If I leave it in, the
program fails. The last line should print the list [I].
Michael
import
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 19:04 -0700, michael rice wrote:
markov4.hs:35:27: Couldn't match expected type `Map k a'
against inferred type `(Map Prefix [String], Prefix, [String])'
ghc seems to believe `mp' here is not just a map, but the entire state
(which is what execState is meant to give
Interesting comment on the book The Fun of Programming in JOOP.
In several chapters there is a penetrating conceptual analysis of the
matter at hand, on which a superstructure of code is erected.
--
--
Regards,
KC
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Extension for Pearls of Functional Algorithm Design by Richard Bird,
2010, page 25 #Haskell
---
---
module SelectionProblem where
import
Do you have some sort of link aggregator that auto-posts to haskell-cafe?
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:09 AM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Extension for Pearls of Functional Algorithm Design by Richard Bird,
2010, page 25 #Haskell
28 matches
Mail list logo
