On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Joe English [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me either; in fact even 1/4 of the time debugging
sounds quite high.
When I first started using Haskell, most of my time
went to fighting with the typechecker, but once the
code checked it almost
Dave Tweed wrote:
If you discard `compliation preventing, very very quick to solve' bugs
(e.g., missing semi-colons in C++, silly typecheck errors in Haskell) I
find that the ratio between source code bugs and algorithm bugs is maybe
1:5. This means that whilst I find Haskell a great deal
[D. Tweed [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Andrew Moran wrote:
Dave Tweed wrote:
If you discard `compliation preventing, very very quick to solve' bugs
(e.g., missing semi-colons in C++, silly typecheck errors in Haskell) I
find that the ratio between source code bugs
Ya has intentado algo como,
twiddlefactor (1 :: Float) (1 :: Integer) ?
El problema tuya es que no hay un 'type' que es 'Floating' y 'Integral'
en el mismo tiempo.
Tom
Buenas noches, quisiera consultarles sobre lo siguiente, tengo estas
dos funciones
-- Calcula Raiz Wn
wn n = cos c :+
