[Haskell-cafe] DiscreteMap

2004-07-30 Thread Henning Thielemann
In addition to the former discussion: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2002-October/010629.html Has someone thought about a type class that provides a uniform interface to Array and FiniteMap? The difference to a general Function class is that a DiscreteMap could return its domain, that

[Haskell-cafe] humor

2004-07-30 Thread enrico . santoemma
When I met Java some time ago, I said to myself: Java is a great language to write IDEs for the Java language. Now that I'm looking for Haskell source code (perhpas that there is another way to learn a language than to spy on others?), I'm tempted to say: Haskell is a great language to write

[Haskell-cafe] Re: humor

2004-07-30 Thread Gabriel Ebner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well... more seriously, does someone have got links to applications with visible source? The only one I know is darcs: http://abridgegame.org/darcs Gabriel. pgpuyQnbS1skj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Haskell-cafe] humor

2004-07-30 Thread John Meacham
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 04:41:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I met Java some time ago, I said to myself: Java is a great language to write IDEs for the Java language. Now that I'm looking for Haskell source code (perhpas that there is another way to learn a language than to spy on

Re: [Haskell-cafe] humor

2004-07-30 Thread Jon Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I met Java some time ago, I said to myself: Java is a great language to write IDEs for the Java language. Now that I'm looking for Haskell source code (perhpas that there is another way to learn a language than to spy on others?), I'm tempted to say: Haskell is

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: humor

2004-07-30 Thread Jon Cast
Sean Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel Ebner wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well... more seriously, does someone have got links to applications with visible source? The only one I know is darcs: http://abridgegame.org/darcs which is actually quite readable, even for

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: humor

2004-07-30 Thread Sean Perry
Jon Cast wrote: Obviously you haven't realized the great beauty of $. You cannot like $ to much. foldr should be defined as follows: foldr f z [] = id $ z foldr f z (x:xn) = (f $ x) $ foldr f z xn etc. :) Am I to assume there is some sarcasm here? Hope so (-: (Sorry, still new to the list,