Hello Kimberley,
Thursday, June 30, 2005, 9:43:31 PM, you wrote:
library for reading Java bytecode.
btw, it may be much simpler to make binding to existing library,
especially if it's written in C/C++. there is a plenty of tools for
semi-automated generation of such bindings
--
Best
Hi all,
A simple question for advanced Haskellers, but I still have some
problems bending my mind over it.
Example: I have some function, that can return multiple results.
Currently I need only the first one, but in the spirit of NotJustMaybe,
I try to be as general as possible.
If I
Arka,
as you already mentioned, you want to have a look at the Scrap your
Boilerplate approach.
import Data.Generics
...
data Expr = Const Int | Var String | Add Expr Expr deriving (Typeable, Data)
will derive the necessary Data instance and allow you to define
optimizeDeep :: Data a = a -
On 30 June 2005 14:36, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
It is in CVS now, and I believe will be in 6.4.1
Not planned for 6.4.1, but definitely in 6.6.
Cheers,
Simon
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Sven Moritz Hallberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29. Jun 2005 um 11.03 Uhr schrieb Simon Marlow:
On 28 June 2005 14:11, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
[...] how about using Pesco's library versioning scheme? (see
http://www.haskell.org/tmrwiki/EternalCompatibilityInTheory)
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Gracjan Polak wrote:
Example: I have some function, that can return multiple results.
Currently I need only the first one, but in the spirit of NotJustMaybe,
I try to be as general as possible.
If I code it like this:
reduction :: (MonadPlus m)
Hi,
Christian Maeder wrote:
I would like to see the advantages of both, programatica's documentation
generation and haddock, to be united. (programatica sources don't go
through haddock and have few type signatures that haddock could exploit,
and haddock comments are useless for programatica.)
