2005/11/13, Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sven Panne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* DocBook XML can be transformed into a very rich collection of output
formats: XHTML, HTML Help, DVI, PS, PDF, FO, plain text, etc. etc.
txt2tags has the following backends: HTML, XHTML, SGML, LaTeX, Lout,
man,
Sven Panne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Great! If you have already an XML editor, start writing DocBook now! :-)
No, I won't :-)
More seriously: This is again a useless tools discussion, we *are* using
DocBook currently and it works fine. The real problem is not the XML format
and any XML
Am Sonntag, 13. November 2005 22:22 schrieb Gour:
[...]
But don't forget, as it was already stated, get the whole working-chain
ready for authoring in Docbook is not at all ready and for one not
proficient in emacs with SGML mode it is very difficult to write texts with
so many tags.
You
Gour wrote:
Nobody said that DocBook does not work fine. However let me quote SPJ's
message:
quote
However, I still wonder if there are things we could do that would make
it easier for people to contribute. Here are two concrete suggestions:
^^^
- Make it possible for people to add
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Hmm, MediaWiki already supports the concept of discussion pages.
Yes, I know. Perhaps I was less than lucid, so to clarify:
But I doubt that it's a good thing to maintain DocBook sources via a wiki.
I think it would be best to keep the documentation in DocBook
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:03 +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Sonntag, 13. November 2005 22:05 schrieb Gour:
[...]
The question is if HTML is sufficient. In addition, HTML is at some
points not well thought-out.
True, but considering the present situation, it is all what is
Am Sonntag, 13. November 2005 22:05 schrieb Gour:
[...]
The question is if HTML is sufficient. In addition, HTML is at some
points not well thought-out.
True, but considering the present situation, it is all what is required.
I doubt this. How, for example, do you implement code
Am Montag, 14. November 2005 10:49 schrieb Ketil Malde:
[...]
I think it would be ideal to provide the documentation on the web as
now, but linking to wikified talk pages. Something like Wikipedia,
(since MediaWiki was brought up) but perhaps with restricted write
access to the feature
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to download a binary file (an mp3) from a given URL, at the
moment I've found two possible solutions:
1) Use the Network.Socket library from ghc to get the file. The problem
with this is that I'll have to deal with the HTTP protocol (done), and
read the Handle in binary
Folks,
Does this ring a bell with anyone? logon.exe is a binary that I built
with -O -debug and ran from within gdb on Windows.
warning HEAP:[logon.exe]
warning: Failing creating uncommitted range (7fbfc000 for 5000)
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
This is surely a dumb question, but where can I find a proof of the
Church-Rosser theorem?
Now, a totally(?) separate question: I've been trying to do some
background reading on lambda calculus, and have found discussions of
strict evaluation strategies (call-by-value and call-by-name)
First of all, I'm very new to Haskell (but very impressed). I
remember having a lot of fun with Lisp as an undergrad, and recently
started working with Scheme (and having a great time at it), and so I
decided to look into Haskell. Like everyone else, I was totally
impressed by the two line
12 matches
Mail list logo
