[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Then another problem,after I unregistered cgi-2006.9.6,the
fastcgi-2006.10.9could't work well with
cgi-1.0 .
You might need fastcgi-1.0:
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~bringert/darcs/haskell-fastcgi
Actually,I was trying my best to install hope:
haskell:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Then another problem,after I unregistered cgi-2006.9.6,the
fastcgi-2006.10.9could't work well with
cgi-1.0 .
You might need fastcgi-1.0:
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~bringert/darcs/haskell-fastcgi
Actually,I was trying my best to install hope:
bulat.ziganshin:
Hello Yitzchak,
Friday, February 9, 2007, 3:23:53 PM, you wrote:
I would like to use FFI for the first time. Can someone
give me a really, really simple complete example?
nothing can be easier
main = print (c_mysin 1.0)
foreign import ccall mysin.h mysin
Hello,
i'd a discussion in russian programmer's forum (rsdn.ru) about
haskell and learning it. one interesting point was that imperative
programmers imagine that multi-threading programming should require
special knowledges. they was really amazed when i showed the following
program that creates
Hello Donald,
Saturday, February 10, 2007, 11:21:58 AM, you wrote:
foreign import ccall mysin.h mysin
c_mysin :: Double - Double
Shouldn't that be CDouble? At least for Int/CInt you can hit troubles on
64 bit machines...
conceptually - yes. practically, it should be the same for all
vishy anand [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi i am going through yaht tutorial and exercise 4.6 and 4.7..i
understood
4.6,but not 4.7 in which fromTuple (One a ) = Left (Left a ) and
fromTuple
(Two a b ) = Left (Right (a,b) ) function r written..why use Either
type..cant i just say fromTuple (Two a
I'm not sure what you're asking. The (untyped) lambda calculus is
Turing complete.
How could seq improve that?
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:18 , Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
I think seq is funny because it is not lambda definable.
Does the set of computable functions on the
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:32 +1100, John Ky wrote:
Hi,
I noticed on Windows that when I use IO functions that write to stdout
when the process is lacking a console, those functions throw an
IOError. I'm not sure if this also occurs for stderr because I
haven't tried it.
Some classes of
Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2007 09:21 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart:
bulat.ziganshin:
Hello Yitzchak,
Friday, February 9, 2007, 3:23:53 PM, you wrote:
I would like to use FFI for the first time. Can someone
give me a really, really simple complete example?
nothing can be easier
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for your comments. In the context of a haskell process running as a
Windows service, a message box is useless, because Haskell services do not
have a GUI and cannot interact with the desktop.
-John
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Has anyone tried embedding ghc into their app?
How big are the resulting binaries?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Is anyone using Haskell as a scripting language in their app?
I'm thinking of viable it would be to embed ghc in a Mac (Cocoa) app.
TextMate [1] uses Ruby as the extension language and quite
successfully at that. Everybody loves Ruby since it's simple. I need
a trading systems language and
On 2/10/07, Joel Reymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using Haskell as a scripting language in their app?
I'm thinking of viable it would be to embed ghc in a Mac (Cocoa) app.
Is your application primarily written in Haskell? If not, you would have to
create an interface between that
If you have to ask, you can't afford it. :)
The GHC API is not modular--if you use it, then the entirety of GHC is
included into your program. That means that your executable will increase by
the size of ghc.exe.
Furthermore, you will also need to ship several of the supporting
executables,
On Feb 10, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Is your application primarily written in Haskell? If not, you would
have to
create an interface between that language and Haskell in order for
your
Haskell programs to manipulate your domain objects and user interface.
It would be
Hi
Also, I recommend looking into embedding YHC. I have not had a
chance to use
it yet, but it looks like it is a better fit to an interpreter-only
embedding situation than GHC--with GHC, you are getting a lot more
than you
seem to be asking for.
I would want to compile code as well.
Hello haskell-cafe,
just another interesting discussion in russian forum raised such idea:
we all say that monads are the haskell way to do i/o. is it true? may
be, uniqueness types, just like in Clean and Mercury, are real way, and
monads are only the way to write programs that use uniqueness
The following C program was described on #haskell
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
double x = 1.0/3.0;
double y = 3.0;
int i= 1;
for (; i=10; i++) {
x = x*y/3.0;
y = x*9.0;
}
printf(%f\n, x+y);
}
dons:
The following C program was described on #haskell
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
double x = 1.0/3.0;
double y = 3.0;
int i= 1;
for (; i=10; i++) {
x = x*y/3.0;
y = x*9.0;
}
GCC 4.x gets a pass on this test. :)
You can do (much) better than that, of course.
But it's what I'd expect without going over board.
-- Lennart
On Feb 10, 2007, at 16:45 , Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dons:
The following C program was described on #haskell
#include stdio.h
On 2/10/07, Donald Bruce Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following C program was described on #haskell
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
double x = 1.0/3.0;
double y = 3.0;
int i= 1;
for (; i=10; i++) {
x = x*y/3.0;
On 2/10/07, Rafael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the haskell program took so long, the C program went really faster
than the haskell version:
$ gcc -O3 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -std=c99 loop.c -o c_loop
$ time ./c_loop
3.33
real0m0.001s
user0m0.000s
sys
On 2/10/07, Felipe Almeida Lessa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5),
the following asm code is generated for part of the main function:
mov dword ptr [esp+4], 0aaabh
mov dword ptr [esp+8], 400ah
mov dword
Very rarely is a nontrivial solution the only way. Monads are a
construct that nicely represents the sequencing side-effecting
computations in a pure and strongly-typed environment. They are a nice
way to do it, but certainly not the only one.
Now I'm not confident enough to boldly make this
Yes! That's the code I like.
On Feb 10, 2007, at 17:46 , Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
On 2/10/07, Rafael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the haskell program took so long, the C program went really
faster
than the haskell version:
$ gcc -O3 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -std=c99
Gah. For the first time ever, I seem to have accidentally done a reply to
sender. (IE Bulat please ignore this message)
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:25:19PM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello haskell-cafe,
just another interesting discussion in russian forum raised such idea:
we all say
hmm, my inexperienced forwarding attempt mangled the message...
data Process = Getc (Char -Process)
| Putc Char (() -Process)
| forall a. NewIORef a (IORef a -Process)
| forall a. ReadIORef (IORef a) (a -Process)
| forall a. WriteIORef
On 2/10/07, Donald Bruce Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To everyone's surprise, GHC 6.6 beats GCC (3.3.5) here, at least the two test
machines:
$ ghc -O -fexcess-precision -fbang-patterns -optc-O3 -optc-ffast-math
-optc-mfpmath=sse -optc-msse2 A.hs -o a
$ time ./a
3.33
Hello Rafael,
Saturday, February 10, 2007, 8:26:38 PM, you wrote:
I'm using debian etch (linux), my processor is a pentium 4 3.0ghz, which
has sse and sse2
Showing that this kind of benchmarking is usually not very accurate or,
at least, that my processor is not well suited for functional
Sigh, I seem to have done a reply to sender. Reposting to the list.
On 06/02/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to create a Haskell function that generates a truth table, for
all Boolean values, say, using the following and function :
and :: Bool - Bool - Bool
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in Haskell, and I
was wondering if there was a way to improve the following method of
generating the list of all prime numbers. It takes about 13 seconds to run,
meanwhile my friend's C version took 0.1. I'd love to
There are many things that makes your code slow.
* The default for Haskell is to compute with Integer, not Int. So
that makes from Integral and floor very slow.
* foldl' is a bad choice, because it is too strict, you want to abort
the loop as soon as possible.
* your take is really wrong.
Hbc implements the IO type by request/response IO. I.e., the original
Haskell I/O system. People who assume IO involves some RealWorld being
passed around are just making unwarranted assumptions. The Haskell
definition leaves the IO type abstract.
-- Lennart
On Feb 10, 2007, at 19:16
On 2/10/07, Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many things that makes your code slow.
* The default for Haskell is to compute with Integer, not Int. So
that makes from Integral and floor very slow.
* foldl' is a bad choice, because it is too strict, you want to abort
the
Gah! Gmail has really broken defaults for posting to lists.
On 10/02/07, Creighton Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in Haskell, and I
was wondering if there was a way to improve the following method of
generating the list
On 2/10/07, Creighton Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/07, Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many things that makes your code slow.
* The default for Haskell is to compute with Integer, not Int. So
that makes from Integral and floor very slow.
* foldl' is a bad
On 2/10/07, Peter Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gah! Gmail has really broken defaults for posting to lists.
On 10/02/07, Creighton Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in Haskell, and
I
was wondering if there was a way to
Creighton Hogg wrote:
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in Haskell, and I
was wondering if there was a way to improve the following method of
generating the list of all prime numbers. It takes about 13 seconds to
run, meanwhile my friend's C version
Yeah, the 1 first primes takes about 0.1 seconds in Haskell too
using the code I posted.
On Feb 10, 2007, at 21:49 , Creighton Hogg wrote:
On 2/10/07, Peter Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gah! Gmail has
really broken defaults for posting to lists.
On 10/02/07, Creighton Hogg [EMAIL
This is actually a pretty good algorithm. And also a rather subtle
one when it comes to termination. :)
-- Lennart
On Feb 10, 2007, at 22:00 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creighton Hogg wrote:
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in
Haskell,
Hello Creighton,
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 12:02:09 AM, you wrote:
import Data.List
primes = 2:(foldr (\x y - if isPrime x then x:y else y) [] [3..])
where isPrime x = foldl' (\z y - z (if x `mod` y == 0 then
False else True)) True (take (floor $ sqrt $ fromIntegral x) primes)
my
On 2/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creighton Hogg wrote:
Hello Haskell-ers,
So a friend and I were thinking about making code faster in Haskell, and
I
was wondering if there was a way to improve the following method of
generating the list of all prime numbers. It takes
You're right, 'fix' is *not* a fix for non-termination, this is better
fixed in the type system (with the right fixed points or you're in a fix) ;)
Fixed regards,
apfelmus
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
This is actually a pretty good algorithm. And also a rather subtle one
when it comes to
On Feb 10, 2007, at 9:15 , Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
haskell:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Then another problem,after I unregistered cgi-2006.9.6,the
fastcgi-2006.10.9could't work well with
cgi-1.0 .
You might need fastcgi-1.0:
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~bringert/darcs/haskell-fastcgi
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:37:04 +0100
Bjorn Bringert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also recently changed the version number scheme on most of the
packages I maintain (which includes most of the packages required by
Hope) from a date-based one to a major.minor scheme. This has the
Thanks to everyone for all the help! Everything
is working for me now. It turns out that the main
detail I was missing was exactly what commands
to type to compile it, and how to use it in GHCI.
Pretty important detail, actually.
Alistair - yes, there are a few simpler pages about
FFI on the old
A wee bit off topic, but I'm sure it's an acceptable detour.
I just wanted to say that I appreciate both this sort of post and the
consistent responses it solicits. I have yet to need my Haskell to
perform well, but I'm sure that day will come. I like to follow these
questions and hopefully be
Folks,
Where can I find Lambada these days and would it be of any use to me
in trying to connect to a Weblogic server?
To make the long story short, my broker's Java software connects to a
remote Weblogic server and I would like to do the same. I suppose
this would require me to
I've always found the following definition of the sieve of eratosthenes
the clearest definition one could write:
sieve [] = []
sieve (x:xs) = x : sieve [y | y - xs, y `mod` x /= 0]
It doesn't perform better than Augustsson's solution. It does fairly
worse, actually, but it performs way better
Folks,
Is there a Java parser implemented using Parsec?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On 2/9/07, vishy anand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just started on my journey in learning Haskell.I have started off
reading wikibook,then will read yet another tutorial on haskell.Please guide
me if I am on right track
The book I used on my learning was Haskell: the craft of functional
Rafael Almeida said:
I've always found the following definition of the sieve of eratosthenes
the clearest definition one could write:
sieve [] = []
sieve (x:xs) = x : sieve [y | y - xs, y `mod` x /= 0]
It doesn't perform better than Augustsson's solution. It does fairly
worse, actually,
joelr1:
Is anyone using Haskell as a scripting language in their app?
I'm thinking of viable it would be to embed ghc in a Mac (Cocoa) app.
TextMate [1] uses Ruby as the extension language and quite
successfully at that. Everybody loves Ruby since it's simple. I need
a trading systems
53 matches
Mail list logo
