On 1 July 2010 16:04, Christopher Tauss wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I just a day or so ago downloaded Hakell and am playing around with it, and
> I came upon this problem with WinGHCi:
>
> I am able to enter a multi-line "do" statement that works if I use brackets
> and semi-colon like so:
>
> Prelude> :
Hello -
I just a day or so ago downloaded Hakell and am playing around with it, and
I came upon this problem with WinGHCi:
I am able to enter a multi-line "do" statement that works if I use brackets
and semi-colon like so:
Prelude> :{
Prelude| let main2 = do {
Prelude| putStrLn "Please enter you
If anyone wants to see the popularity of their particular package(s), dons
has kindly left a .txt file with the information
at the following URL:
http://code.haskell.org/~dons/hackage/Jun-2010/popular.txt .
Of course, this being Haskell, I had to whip up a little script to get the
information for
Downloads and popular packages on Hackage for Q1 and Q2 this year.
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/popular-haskell-packages-q2-2010-report/
-- Don
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listin
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>From the Polyparse homepage (http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/polyparse/):
,
| If you are familiar with the Parsec library, then the key insight for
| using PolyParse is that the two libraries' approach to backtracking
| are the duals of each another. In Parsec, you
>>
>
> Doesn't that mean that hare requires also type information?
> Even though haskell-src-exts is impressive, I doubt it comes with a
> typechecker for GHC Haskell.
HaRe does require a type checker, but we use hint for that, not Programmatica.
So haskell-src-exts shouldn't interfere... bu
paul:
> I'm starting to see job adverts mentioning Haskell as a "nice to have",
> and even in some cases as a technology to work with.
>
> However right now I'm looking at it from the other side. Suppose
> someone wants to hire a Haskell developer or three. How easy is this?
> I'd apprecia
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I'm starting to see job adverts mentioning Haskell as a "nice to have", and
>> even in some cases as a technology to work with.
>>
>> However right now I'm looking at it from the other side. Suppose someone
>> wants to hire a Haskell devel
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm starting to see job adverts mentioning Haskell as a "nice to have", and
> even in some cases as a technology to work with.
>
> However right now I'm looking at it from the other side. Suppose someone
> wants to hire a Haskell developer or
On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:51 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
> Chris BROWN writes:
>
>> On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:55, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>> I talked with you and Simon Thompson about this at PEPM, and at the time
>>> you said that haskell-src-exts didn't have what you needed for HaRe.
>>>
I'm starting to see job adverts mentioning Haskell as a "nice to have",
and even in some cases as a technology to work with.
However right now I'm looking at it from the other side. Suppose
someone wants to hire a Haskell developer or three. How easy is this?
I'd appreciate replies from peo
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Kahlenberg wrote:
when installing pandoc package, which has digest somewhere in
dependencies the usual cabal install stucks because zlib.h is missing
[...]
I had a similar or the same problem with digest and zlib.h two months
ago, which I reported to the Haskell platform tr
Dear Haskellers,
I am in the process of creating a cabal HaRe and I have run into a minor
problem. I have an emacs and a vim script that HaRe uses to invoke the
refactorer from the two editors. In those scripts, I point HaRe to a directory
containing some libraries it needs to chase the imports
I have too faced situation like Martin but haven't given up I stay
near egl. Please let me know when you guys are planning to meet
Amir
On Jun 29, 2010 10:00 AM, "Lakshmi Narasimhan"
wrote:
Wow! great to see Haskellers from B'lore. I'll be interested too.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:00
Dear all,
I've just finished implementing a complete rewrite of the Haskell and
Literate Haskell files for Kate. This improves the previous version in
many ways:
* Operators are now supported (++, !, >>=, and any other combination
of legal operator characters)
* Special symbols are recognised (=>
>>
>
> The Annotated part of haskell-src-exts provides this I think:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskell-src-exts/1.9.0/doc/html/Language-Haskell-Exts-Annotated.html
>
Thanks, Ivan, I'll take a look at this. I wonder if would be possible to write
a mapping for haskell-exts-an
Stephen Tetley wrote:
> Malcolm Wallace describes a commit combinator in the paper "Partial
> parsing: combining choice with commitment" which sounds like what you
> would want. It is implemented for Polyparse rather than Parsec though.
Yes, I can see how that might help on some kinds of data. Th
On 29/06/2010 23:31, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:01:54 +0200, Simon Marlow
wrote:
Comments on the draft report are welcome, before I finalise this and
sign off on Haskell 2010.
Subsection 12.3, "Language extensions", mentions the FFI as a language
extension, but FFI is no
Stephen Tetley writes:
> Hi Erik
>
> Malcolm Wallace describes a commit combinator in the paper "Partial
> parsing: combining choice with commitment" which sounds like what you
> would want. It is implemented for Polyparse rather than Parsec though.
> From a quick scan of the paper and code, the
Hi Erik
Malcolm Wallace describes a commit combinator in the paper "Partial
parsing: combining choice with commitment" which sounds like what you
would want. It is implemented for Polyparse rather than Parsec though.
>From a quick scan of the paper and code, the implementation appears to
be built
20 matches
Mail list logo
