This package provides imperative-style loops supporting "continue" and
"break". For example:
import Control.Monad
import Control.Monad.IO.Class
import Control.Monad.Trans.Loop
import Control.Monad.Trans.Class
main :: IO ()
main =
foreach [0..] $ \i ->
fore
Hi, I'm trying to implement a matrix product example using DPH. This is the
code:
---
type MMultType = Double
type Matrix = [:[:MMultType:]:]
type MVector = [:MMultType:]
type Matrix_wra
Is this anything like the hssqlppp package?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Yes, that would be very nice!
Type-checked queries really is a must, but I´ve found HaskellDB too
cumbersome to work with.
-Rune
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Paul Visschers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been out of the Haskell game for a bit, but now I'm back. A couple of
> years ago I made a sm
Hello cafe,
there's an upcomming meeting of the Haskell user group Hamburg next
Thursday (July 12th).
We'll start 19:00 at the Xing AG in Hamburg (Dammtorstraße 35, 20354 Hamburg
).
Jan Ahrens will give a short talk about web development with Yesod (
http://www.yesodweb.com/). Although this anno
On 7/8/2012 11:28 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
Is there a way to control defaulting in ghci? (Like the "default"
declaration in source files does.)
ghci 7.4.1 doesn't accept "default" declarations. I tried loading a
module with a "default" declaration, but that also didn't affect the
ghci session.
> But in the meantime, regarding what you suggest here, couldn't be
done through tags rather than branches? Tagging a release version could
trigger testing and, if testing runs fine, upload to hackage.
Testing should be done on travis virtual machine. So this question is
not about `when' or `whe
There is a broader plan, about having Hackage2 (in development) and
scoutess (same) work together, but we're not there yet *at all*.
But in the meantime, regarding what you suggest here, couldn't be done
through tags rather than branches? Tagging a release version could trigger
testing and, if tes
Is there a way to control defaulting in ghci? (Like the "default"
declaration in source files does.)
ghci 7.4.1 doesn't accept "default" declarations. I tried loading a
module with a "default" declaration, but that also didn't affect the
ghci session.
It would be ironic if this is possible in sou
I agree that the Raison d'être for a .NET or JVM backend is interop.
Perhaps that's not worth the effort of an entirely new backend. JavaScript
is a different beast, however. I said before:
>From my point of view, languages that cannot run on one of the 3
> aforementioned platforms will become ir
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 10:27 +0200, Gábor Lehel wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
> > I implemented the inductive alignment calculation over One and Twice
> > (good idea, and easy to do), but I don't get the thing about
> > superclasses. I've been trying several approa
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 20:49 +1000, Reiner Pope wrote:
> I've not been following this thread very closely, but it seems like
> what you're trying to do may be related to Geoffrey Mainland's work on
> SIMD support in GHC. See [1] for his "SIMD-enabled version of the
> vector library". He's also writt
*tldr*: is there a way to upload package to hackage from Travis
automatically and safely (hiding password to hackage account)?
Several days ago I discovered Travis ( http://travis-ci.org/ ) - nice
open source build-service, easy to start and monitoring.
I've configured some github projects and
I've not been following this thread very closely, but it seems like what
you're trying to do may be related to Geoffrey Mainland's work on SIMD
support in GHC. See [1] for his "SIMD-enabled version of the vector
library". He's also written some blog posts about this [2].
Reiner
[1] https://github
* Niklas Larsson:
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/FAQ#Why_isn.27t_GHC_available_for_.NET_or_on_the_JVM.3F
> "It would make a lot of sense to give GHC a .NET or JVM back end, and
> it's a question that comes up regularly. The reason that we haven't
> done it here, at GHC HQ, is because it'
Hi all,
For GHC development questions (ie hacking on GHC, not with GHC) which
is the appropriate mailing list ghc-cvs or ghc-users?
Cheers,
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
__
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 01:40 +0200, Gábor Lehel wrote:
>> unsafeXorSSE42 :: (Storable a,
>> > SV.AlignedToAtLeast SV.A16 o1, SV.Alignment o1,
>> > SV.AlignedToAtLeast SV.A16 o2, SV.Alignment o2,
>> > SV.AlignedToAtLeast SV.A16 o3
17 matches
Mail list logo
