On Aug 19, 2012, at 10:40 , Heinrich Apfelmus apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
Doaitse Swierstra wrote:
Over the years we have been constructing a collection of Embedded
Domain Specific Languages for describing compilers which are
assembled from fragments which can be compiled individually.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:57 AM, David Feuer david.fe...@gmail.com wrote:
If the language is changed (without possibility of breakage, I
believe) so that names declared in a module shadow imported names,
incompatibility can only arise if two different imports offer the same
name, and it is
Adde Nilsson wrote:
Ok, do you know of any way to add/subtract without converting to UTC and
back?
Brandon Allbery wrote:
I'm not sure I'd do that in any environment, since usually libraries don't
deal with the result crossing a daylight/summer time change (and those that
do, surprise
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
Curl is making the request, but if I remove the (hPutStrLn stderr
response_body), it doesn't work! What's even more insane is, this works:
hPutStrLn stderr response_body
and this doesn't:
hPutStrLn stdout
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:45:47AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/18/2012 08:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I'm one bug away from a working program and need some help. I wrote a
little utility that logs into LWN.net, retrieves an article, and creates
an epub out of it.
I've created
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:45:47AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/18/2012 08:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I'm one bug away from a working program and need some help. I wrote a
little utility that logs into LWN.net,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Adde Nilsson trialc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
How do you add to or subtract from a LocalTime?
I'm trying to subtract a second from a LocalTime value but the only API's
I can find act only on the TimeOfDay part.
subSec :: LocalTime - LocalTime
subSec
On 08/19/2012 12:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On more investigation, this seems to be due to the somewhat careless use
of Foreign.Concurrent; from the docs:
“The finalizer will be executed after the last reference to the
foreign object is dropped. There is no guarantee of promptness, and
I agree with Bryan's proposal unreservedly.
However, I think there might be a way to resolve the tension between:
* maintaining and publishing a definite dependent-package configuration
that is known to work and
* having a package unencumbered with arbitrary restrictions on which
future
