Pieter Laeremans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The http-proxy package isn't compatible any longer with the latest
> conduit. Since it is open source, I thought, I might as well try to adapt
> it and submit a patch.
Have you looked int git?
It currently compiles from git but there is a space leak that
I hav
Excellent work, Chris!
Looking forward to using your tool!
Ciao!
Alfredo
Sent from my iPad
On 27/dic/2012, at 01:43, Christopher Done wrote:
> Ahoy hoy,
>
> Just thought I'd announce a tool I whipped up these evening to take a
> module name and a name and output the installed Haddock document
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> * Rustom Mody [2012-12-26 20:12:17+0530]
> > So is there any set of flags to make haskell literals less polymorphic?
>
> Yes, there is!
>
> % ghci -XRebindableSyntax
> GHCi, version 7.6.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
>
Ahoy hoy,
Just thought I'd announce a tool I whipped up these evening to take a
module name and a name and output the installed Haddock documentation
for it. Examples with my GHCi session:
λ> :doc Data.List.Split split
Split a list according to the given splitting strategy. This is
how to "run"
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Pieter Laeremans wrote:
> Network/HTTP/Proxy.hs:254:15:
> Couldn't match expected type `ResourceT
> IO (CIN.Pipe () () ByteString ()
> (ResourceT IO) ())'
> with actual type `IO
>
Hi,
The http-proxy package isn't compatible any longer with the latest
conduit. Since it is open source, I thought, I might as well try to adapt
it and submit a patch.
However I run into some difficulties.
For example I get this type error when I'm trying to compile it :
Network/HTTP/Proxy.hs:
Hi everybody, we will be running a nano-hackathon on the CCC congress
in Hamburg on Thursday, 2012-12-27, 5pm German time:
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2012/wiki/Haskell_BOF
Sorry for the short notice. If you would like to meet up later during
the congress please drop us a line.
cheers,
ma
* Rustom Mody [2012-12-26 20:12:17+0530]
> So is there any set of flags to make haskell literals less polymorphic?
Yes, there is!
% ghci -XRebindableSyntax
GHCi, version 7.6.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package integer
Sorry, forgot the link:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.4/html/users_guide/interactive-evaluation.html
Section 2.4.5 Type defaulting in GHCi
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
You should note that GHCi uses extended defaulting rules as explained in
[1].
This means that a literal like 5 will only be of type Num a => a in GHCi
while in a normal Haskell program it will default to some concrete type
(Integer if there are no other constraints). Also, if you define x = 5
in a
Since recently, the notion of prisms from the lens library can achieve
that : to modify a value only in certain conditions but you have to
write the prism so it's not that convenient, though at least you'll
have an uniform API.
See
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/lens/3.7.0.2/doc/html/
In haskell, we have
Prelude> :t 4
4 :: Num a => a
Prelude>
This may be nice in its generality but it makes it hard (for me at least)
when teaching a beginners course to teach polymorphic vs monomorphic
types. The above leads to even more 'advanced' results like this:
Prelude> :t [[1],2]
[[1],2]
Hello chums,
I've been playing around with an idea, something that has obvious pros
and cons, but I'll sell it to you because there might be some positive
ideas out of it. Consider the following operator:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators, DataKinds, KindSignatures #-}
module Docs where
im
13 matches
Mail list logo
