Hi all,
I'm new to Haskell, and don't quite understand how IO and lazy
evaluation work together yet. In order to improve my understanding, I
thought I'd try to knock together a translation of a fairly simple
problem I can code up in C, that of calculating pi by throwing random
numbers
Hi all,
Does anyone know if c2hs should be working on Windows? I'm trying to
build it under ghc 6.8.0, but this happens:
C:\Users\Alex\Documents\Plugins\c2hs\c2hs-0.15.0runghc Setup.hs configure
Configuring c2hs-0.15.0...
Setup.hs: Error: Non-empty library, but empty exposed modules list.
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
No GLUT is not bundled with GHC 6.8.1 anymore. Yes, that is weird.
It was bundled with GHC 6.6.1. But installing it for GHC 6.8.1 is really
easy, but you have to install msys/mingw first.
This is handled in Ruby-land by having binary packages available for
Windows,
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:33:21 +, Vladimir Zlatanov wrote:
Yes, those are good points. Maybe adding functionality similar to plt's
planet http://planet.plt-scheme.org and
http://download.plt-scheme.org/doc/371/html/mzscheme/mzscheme-Z-H-5.html#node_sec_5.4
In plt
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 20:40:01 +, Alex Young wrote:
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:33:21 +, Vladimir Zlatanov wrote:
Yes, those are good points. Maybe adding functionality similar to plt's
planet http://planet.plt-scheme.org and
http
Alex Jacobson wrote:
My original point (refined) was that I'd like a file extension (.ehs)
that defaults to including all extensions that don't change the meaning
of a .hs program but that may cause a small subset of them not to
compile (e.g. ones that use forall as a type variable, foreign as
Dusan Kolar wrote:
Hello,
I don't know about math, but a practical usage seems to be in the
reconfigurable hardware (FPGA). See web-page of my colleague, where is
list of his papers on the topic.
http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~sekanina/pubs.php
These people use GAs for optimising water networks
Isaac Dupree wrote:
Derek Elkins wrote:
and you can have
unboxed values in dynamically typed languages.
really? Sure that's possible as an optimization, but I thought that to
explicitly specify that would require a known static type. Or perhaps
the bit-tagging by which some Scheme
