- Forwarded Message -
From: Michael Matsko msmat...@comcast.net
To: Nick Rudnick joerg.rudn...@t-online.de
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:16:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Category Theory woes
Gregg,
Topologically speaking, the border
To: Michael Matsko msmat...@comcast.net
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:15:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] Category Theory woes
Hi Mike,
so an open set does not contain elements constituting a border/boundary of it,
does
for
the Working Mathematician. Although, I don't seem to recall instant
enlightenment when I picked it up.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Nick Rudnick joerg.rudn...@t-online.de
To: Michael Matsko msmat...@comcast.net
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:54:03 PM
You might want to look at Pari/GP ( http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/ ) for ideas
of what kind of functions to supply. Also, as a source of ideas for algorithms.
Mike Matsko
- Original Message -
From: Max Rabkin max.rab...@gmail.com
To: Andrew Wagner wagner.and...@gmail.com
Cc: R.A.
Also, Walter Noll of Carnegie Mellon Univ. wrote a book,
Finite-Dimensional Spacesin 1987 which basically presented
undergraduate math in a notationally and conceptually unified manner.
Some of the notation and terminology was strange, but consistent.
Mike Matsko
- Original Message
Dimitri
Matriods are generalization of vector spaces. Basically, they are
defined by a set of linear dependence axioms and basis exchange
properties. Oxley's Matriod Theory is the standard reference. There
are a multitude of equivalent formulations.
Mike Matsko
- Original
