Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is this a correct explanation of FRP?

2012-04-02 Thread Peter Minten
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 04:03 +0200, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote: Peter Minten peter.min...@orange.nl wrote: As I see FRP it has three components: the basic concepts, the underlying theory and the way the libraries actually work. As far as I understand FRP (which is not very far at all

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is this a correct explanation of FRP?

2012-04-01 Thread Peter Minten
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 02:30 +0200, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote: Peter Minten peter.min...@orange.nl wrote: I've been trying to get my head around Functional Reactive Programming by writing a basic explanation of it, following the logic that explaining something is the best way to understand

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is this a correct explanation of FRP?

2012-03-31 Thread Peter Minten
a NetworkDescription monad. The newEvent function looks like what you'd want, but because you can't get the event firing function out of NetworkDescription its use is limited. Greetings, Peter Minten ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http

[Haskell-cafe] Is this a correct explanation of FRP?

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Minten
Hi, I've been trying to get my head around Functional Reactive Programming by writing a basic explanation of it, following the logic that explaining something is the best way to understand it. Am I on the right track with this explanation? Greetings, Peter Minten P.S. Sorry about the long