PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Haskell-cafe] Tools for Haskell and COM
The biggest Haskell/COM project I know of was Krasimir's implementation of
Visual Haskell, which was a plug-in for Visual Studio. The VS interfaces are
COM ones, so he had to do lots
The biggest Haskell/COM project I know of was Krasimir's implementation of
Visual Haskell, which was a plug-in for Visual Studio. The VS interfaces are
COM ones, so he had to do lots of COM stuff. He may be able to help you.
Sigbjorn Finne knows a lot about HDirect, but he's really busy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon
Peyton-Jones
There's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem here; the COM
tools are not well maintained, so that discourages use, which
in turn makes it less rewarding to work on them. What I
don't know is the level
There's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem here; the COM tools are not well
maintained, so that discourages use, which in turn makes it less rewarding
to work on them. What I don't know is the level of suppressed demand: if
there were good tools, would lots of people start using them?
I think
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
The biggest Haskell/COM project I know of was Krasimir’s
implementation of Visual Haskell, which was a plug-in for Visual
Studio. The VS interfaces are COM ones, so he had to do lots of COM
stuff. He may be able to help you. Sigbjorn Finne knows a lot about
Microsoft's Component Object Model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Object_Model
/g
On 6/27/07, Andrew Coppin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
The biggest Haskell/COM project I know of was Krasimir's
implementation of Visual Haskell, which was a plug-in for Visual
J. Garrett Morris wrote:
Microsoft's Component Object Model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Object_Model
...still left feeling unenlightened.
On the other hand, this is the *Haskell* mailing list, so...
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
On Wednesday 27 June 2007, Andrew Coppin wrote:
J. Garrett Morris wrote:
Microsoft's Component Object Model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Object_Model
...still left feeling unenlightened.
COM documentation does seem to have that effect on people. . .
Jonathan Cast
Alistair Bayley wrote:
I want to interface Takusen with MS Sql Server,
but AFAICT the recommended C API is OLE DB, which
is a COM API.
An alternative would be to write a takusen - freetds binding
(http://www.freetds.org/). This would have the potential benefits of
being
* cross platform
Hello Darrell,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:08:02 +0900, Lewis-Sandy, Darrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there any currently maintained tools for interfacing Haskell with COM
objects? It appears that both Haskell script and Haskell direct haven't
been updated since the turn of the century, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
