Hello,
As vector provides a class generalizing all flavours
(Data.Vector.Generic.Vector), it occurs to me that the same could be done
for ByteString. Then, packages based on it would have the choice between
hardcoded and generic, they wouldn't have to duplicate a module to handle
both strict and
On 27 March 2012 11:00, Yves Parès yves.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As vector provides a class generalizing all flavours
(Data.Vector.Generic.Vector), it occurs to me that the same could be done
for ByteString. Then, packages based on it would have the choice between
hardcoded and generic,
Hi Bas,
Yes, thank you to remind me of that, I remember now having seen the project.
Strict ByteStrings being an alias to Vector Word8 is a good idea (are
bytestrings are already implemented exactly like
Data.Vector.Storable.Vector). But in that case we could use the API of
vector for bytestrings
On 27 March 2012 21:46, Yves Parès yves.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, thank you to remind me of that, I remember now having seen the project.
Strict ByteStrings being an alias to Vector Word8 is a good idea (are
bytestrings are already implemented exactly like
Data.Vector.Storable.Vector). But
Oh, okay ^^ sorry, my bad. I should have compiled with -Wall.
So I started a repo at https://github.com/YwenP/bytestring-generic
Le 27 mars 2012 22:01, Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com a écrit :
On 27 March 2012 21:46, Yves Parès yves.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, thank you to remind me of
