On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:18:17PM +0200, Nicu Ionita wrote:
Am 18.10.2011 18:53, schrieb Stephen Tetley:
Haskell has no support for reflection whatsoever.
It can support compile time meta-programming with Template Haskell.
Reflection itself might be antagonistic to functional programming,
Hi,
Maybe you remember my case.
I was trying to compare some aspects of these languages.
Well... I found that I can compare reflection, support for generics,
simplicity and safe code.
I just want to ask if you have more information for reflection in Haskell.
I read that there is no enough for
Haskell has no support for reflection whatsoever.
It can support compile time meta-programming with Template Haskell.
Reflection itself might be antagonistic to functional programming, I
suspect it is at odds with referential transparency. Most of the work
on reflection seemed based around Lisp
Am 18.10.2011 18:53, schrieb Stephen Tetley:
Haskell has no support for reflection whatsoever.
It can support compile time meta-programming with Template Haskell.
Reflection itself might be antagonistic to functional programming, I
suspect it is at odds with referential transparency. Most of
If i understand correctly, what we called generics is what so called
reflection. It allow you to introspect type structure.
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0/GHC-Generics.html#g:4
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 AM, yrazes yra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Maybe you
