Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 18:33 schrieben Sie:
> Interesting. Thanks for the reply.
>
> It might be nice to have some performance benchmarks for all these
> experimental systems, so we can compare them.
I think, the most important thing is the asymptotical time behavior, e.g.,
whether the ti
l-cafe-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Jeltsch
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:25 PM
> To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Draft chapters of "Real World Haskell" now
> publicly available
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> an answer to an
Hello Peter,
an answer to an “old” e-mail (from January 25). Sorry for not answering
earlier.
Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 00:23 schrieben Sie:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Indeed. A functional approach to GUIs is nice but at the moment we don’t
> > have anything that is suitable for solving r
Afaik, you're right about Yampa not being event-driven. I've been working
on alternatives for a while that are event-driven while still genuinely
functional (non-IO). See http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Reactive and
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/TV . I have some blog posts in the works
about the
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Indeed. A functional approach to GUIs is nice but at the moment we don’t have
anything that is suitable for solving real world problems (although this is
being worked on).
Could you elaborate a bit on that? What are the current obstacles to be
solved?
When I looked at
Am Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2008 10:53 schrieben Sie:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Covering reactive programming would indeed be interesting.
> >
> > I want to add that there is no single way for doing reactive programming
> > in Haskell. There is Conal’s stuff, there is Yampa and there is “my”
> > s
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 14:30:22 Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > I'm posting here because there doesn't seem to be an "overall" comment
> > section, but the TOC seems to cover less ground than I expected. Is
> > the TOC meant to be complete?
>
> No, it's less than a third of the
I think this points out the benefit (or even the need), given the
fast-paced evolution of Haskell and its libraries as a whole, of an
evolving online supplement to your book, minimally with errata and code,
but also (as publisher resources permit) with intermittently updated
appendices on still
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Covering reactive programming would indeed be interesting.
I agree. However, we have no plans to cover this topic. I don't
believe any of us has used FRP, and my impression of it as an approach
is that it's not yet cooked. We already have our hands and TOC full
coveri
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Covering reactive programming would indeed be interesting.
I want to add that there is no single way for doing reactive programming in
Haskell. There is Conal’s stuff, there is Yampa and there is “my” stuff
(Grapefruit [1]) whereby the pros and cons of these approaches
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2008 15:58 schrieb Peter Verswyvelen:
> Wow, the full TOC looks very impressive indeed! Maybe add a chapter
> about reactive programming (Yampa and Conal's latest stuff that I don't
> understand yet) too? :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
Covering reactive programming would indeed be
Wow, the full TOC looks very impressive indeed! Maybe add a chapter
about reactive programming (Yampa and Conal's latest stuff that I don't
understand yet) too? :-)
Cheers,
Peter
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Paul Moore wrote:
I'm posting here because there doesn't seem to be an "overall" comm
On 22/01/2008, Bryan O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > I'm posting here because there doesn't seem to be an "overall" comment
> > section, but the TOC seems to cover less ground than I expected. Is
> > the TOC meant to be complete?
>
> No, it's less than a third of the
Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm posting here because there doesn't seem to be an "overall" comment
> section, but the TOC seems to cover less ground than I expected. Is
> the TOC meant to be complete?
No, it's less than a third of the whole thing.
Here's the announcement from last May, including a more
On 21/01/2008, Bryan O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John, Don and I are pleased to announce the beginning of the public beta
> programme for our upcoming book, "Real World Haskell". For further
> details, please see the following blog entry:
>
> http://www.realworldhaskell.org/blog/2008/0
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2008 20:53 schrieb Bryan O'Sullivan:
> John, Don and I are pleased to announce the beginning of the public beta
> programme for our upcoming book, "Real World Haskell". For further
> details, please see the following blog entry:
>
> http://www.realworldhaskell.org/blog/2008/0
Oops, I just replied to another message asking for such a book!
Amazing that my prayers are answered even before I asked them ;-)
Peter
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:53 -0800, B
ryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> John, Don and I are pleased to announce the beginning of the public beta
> programme for our upc
John, Don and I are pleased to announce the beginning of the public beta
programme for our upcoming book, "Real World Haskell". For further
details, please see the following blog entry:
http://www.realworldhaskell.org/blog/2008/01/21/finally-the-public-beta-programme-begins/
Thanks to all of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
