Stack Overflow and Reddit are at least improvements over the traditional
web forums, starting to acquire some of the features Usenet had twenty
years ago. Much like Planet-style meta-blogs and RSS syndication makes
it liveable to follow blogs.
Very much this. I mourn Usenet's potential as muc
Ketil Malde wrote:
Most web-based email archives seem to suck - where can we point to a nice
URL to get an overview of a -cafe thread?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/82667
Tillmann
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@ha
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Stack Overflow and Reddit are at least improvements over the traditional
> web forums, starting to acquire some of the features Usenet had twenty
> years ago. Much like Planet-style meta-blogs and RSS syndication makes
> it liveable to follow
Daniel Fischer writes:
> On Saturday 30 October 2010 03:42:27, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>> On 30 October 2010 12:22, Lauri Alanko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:55:12PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
The number of subscribers to the Haskell Reddit, for example, is
[...]
>>> In sh
On Saturday 30 October 2010 03:42:27, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 12:22, Lauri Alanko wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:55:12PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> >> The number of subscribers to the Haskell Reddit, for example, is
> >> double the -cafe@, and there are comparable
On 30 October 2010 12:22, Lauri Alanko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:55:12PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
>> The number of subscribers to the Haskell Reddit, for example, is double
>> the -cafe@, and there are comparable numbers of questions being asked on
>> the Stack Overflow [haskell] tag, a
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:55:12PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> The number of subscribers to the Haskell Reddit, for example, is double
> the -cafe@, and there are comparable numbers of questions being asked on
> the Stack Overflow [haskell] tag, as here -- so anyone who only reads
> -cafe@ is alrea
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> So you'd prefer to have the discussion about a blog post be made
> distinct from the blog post itself? Why not keep them together, also
> so that people finding the blog post from someplace other than reddit
> (e.g. planet.haskell.or
ivan.miljenovic:
> On 30 October 2010 09:51, Don Stewart wrote:
> > ivan.miljenovic:
> >> Neither the Haskell reddit nor Stack Overflow are linked to from
> >> haskell.org and there is nothing to indicate that they are "official".
> >> Also, wasn't it Don that started (and is mainly responsible)
On 30 October 2010 09:51, Don Stewart wrote:
> ivan.miljenovic:
>> Neither the Haskell reddit nor Stack Overflow are linked to from
>> haskell.org and there is nothing to indicate that they are "official".
>> Also, wasn't it Don that started (and is mainly responsible) for
>> linking to Haskell a
ivan.miljenovic:
> Neither the Haskell reddit nor Stack Overflow are linked to from
> haskell.org and there is nothing to indicate that they are "official".
> Also, wasn't it Don that started (and is mainly responsible) for
> linking to Haskell articles on reddit?
>
They're linked from the front
On 30 October 2010 05:51, C. McCann wrote:
> Speaking of not wanting more places to keep track of, that's precisely
> why I rarely bother with blog comments and would find discussions on
> reddit preferable: it's a single place to go, and keeps things more
> unified and consistent than whatever co
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> IIUC, [one of] the prime motivating factor[s] behind both reddit and
> StackOverflow is the accumulation of "karma", which leads to people
> posting just to try and accumulate karma even if they don't know what
> they're talking about
On 29 October 2010 07:53, Daniel Fischer wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2010 22:44:04, Stephen Tetley wrote:
>> On 28 October 2010 20:59, Don Stewart wrote:
>> > "Status of Infrastructure" questions like this are best asked on the
>> > Haskell Reddit.
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> > P.S. I encourage people
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:34, Andrew Coppin
wrote:
> Today I uploaded a package to Hackage, and rediscovered something that you
> already know: I'm an idiot.
>
> More specifically, I copied the Cabal description from another package and
> then updated all the fields. Except that I forgot to updat
On Thursday 28 October 2010 22:44:04, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> On 28 October 2010 20:59, Don Stewart wrote:
> > "Status of Infrastructure" questions like this are best asked on the
> > Haskell Reddit.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > P.S. I encourage people to use the online forums: Haskell Reddit and
> > Stack Ov
stephen.tetley:
> On 28 October 2010 20:59, Don Stewart wrote:
> >
> > "Status of Infrastructure" questions like this are best asked on the
> > Haskell Reddit.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > P.S. I encourage people to use the online forums: Haskell Reddit and Stack
> > Overflow, as a lot of the question-answe
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:44:04 +0200, Stephen Tetley
wrote:
P.S. I encourage people to use the online forums: Haskell Reddit and
Stack
Overflow, as a lot of the question-answering activity has shifted there
now, away from -cafe@
Err, Why?
Having to track three places for information rather t
On 28 October 2010 20:59, Don Stewart wrote:
>
> "Status of Infrastructure" questions like this are best asked on the
> Haskell Reddit.
[SNIP]
> P.S. I encourage people to use the online forums: Haskell Reddit and Stack
> Overflow, as a lot of the question-answering activity has shifted there
>
gcross:
> On 10/28/10 12:34 PM, Andrew Coppin wrote:
>> More specifically, I copied the Cabal description from another package
>> and then updated all the fields. Except that I forgot to update one.
>> And now I have a package which I've erroneously placed in completely
>> the wrong category.
On 10/28/10 12:34 PM, Andrew Coppin wrote:
More specifically, I copied the Cabal description from another package
and then updated all the fields. Except that I forgot to update one.
And now I have a package which I've erroneously placed in completely
the wrong category.
I am glad to hear that
Today I uploaded a package to Hackage, and rediscovered something that
you already know: I'm an idiot.
More specifically, I copied the Cabal description from another package
and then updated all the fields. Except that I forgot to update one. And
now I have a package which I've erroneously pla
22 matches
Mail list logo
