Hi all!
I haven't tried the tool myself, but it seems interesting to the Haskell
efforts to compile to JavaScript:
http://syntensity.blogspot.com/2011/04/emscripten-10.html
Cheers,
Sönke
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On 11 April 2011 14:54, Sönke Hahn sh...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
I haven't tried the tool myself, but it seems interesting to the Haskell
efforts to compile to JavaScript:
http://syntensity.blogspot.com/2011/04/emscripten-10.html
Good grief, that sounds incredibly awesome. GHC → LLVM → JS.
Can JS in a browser call out to heavy computational routines in Haskell?
I suppose JS run as a scripting language outside the browser can call
out to Haskell.
Can Haskell open and interact with a browser window without going
through a server like component?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:02 AM,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sönke Hahn sh...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi all!
I haven't tried the tool myself, but it seems interesting to the Haskell
efforts to compile to JavaScript:
http://syntensity.blogspot.com/2011/04/emscripten-10.html
I saw this same article this morning. I
I do wonder how Emscripten handles the GHC calling convention that is
part of LLVM. In particular, global register declarations in the RTS
scare me from a side line view, and LLVM's calling convention support
is what makes the combination work at all in a registered environment.
It's currently not
Time ago YHC compiler (not longer active) got additional backend that
generated JS from Yhc.Core.
It was working quite ok. You can still find demos online.
Generating JS (high level code) from Ghc.Core feels better than from low
level code of LLVM.
Is GHC.core very different from YHC.core?
Sz.
