On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 11:11 +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
FYI: Haskell's OpenGL binding has just been dropped from GHC's
extralibs, which means that it will no longer be kept in sync with GHC
development, at least not by GHC HQ.
GHC HQ has its hands full and -generally speaking -
I don't think that's right. The HP maintainers are not (and cannot be)
the maintainers of each individual package. That just does not scale.
Oh absolutely, but I was imagining that (at least part of) the purpose
of the Platform is to generate automatic notifications to package
owners, when a
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
As a package author (rather than a user), I would see this as a primary
benefit of having my packages added to the Platform. And as a package
user (rather than author), there is the corresponding antibenefit of
removing a package like HOpenGL from the Platform: a
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:34 +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
I don't think that's right. The HP maintainers are not (and cannot be)
the maintainers of each individual package. That just does not scale.
Oh absolutely, but I was imagining that (at least part of) the purpose
of the Platform is
FYI: Haskell's OpenGL binding has just been dropped from GHC's
extralibs, which means that it will no longer be kept in sync with GHC
development, at least not by GHC HQ.
GHC HQ has its hands full and -generally speaking - extralibs are to
be replaced by H(L)P, the Haskell (Library)
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:47:25PM -0400, Jefferson Heard wrote:
Is there a list of outstanding bugs somewhere?
A few of these are OpenGL/GLUT/OpenAL/ALUT bugs:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedcomponent=libraries+%28other%29order=priority
It
FYI: Haskell's OpenGL binding has just been dropped from GHC's
extralibs, which means that it will no longer be kept in sync with GHC
development, at least not by GHC HQ.
GHC HQ has its hands full and -generally speaking - extralibs are to
be replaced by H(L)P, the Haskell (Library) Platform:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 17:57 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
So, if one of you wanted to step forward and offer to keep these
Haskell bindings for OpenGLco maintained, perhaps steward them
into the H(L)P, now would probably be a good time.
I fully expect the GL and AL binding libs to join the
claus.reinke:
FYI: Haskell's OpenGL binding has just been dropped from GHC's
extralibs, which means that it will no longer be kept in sync with GHC
development, at least not by GHC HQ.
GHC HQ has its hands full and -generally speaking - extralibs are to
be replaced by H(L)P, the Haskell
Well, since HOpenGL seems to support practically all of OpenGL 2.1, I
don't see that there's much to maintain, except compatibility with
upcoming releases of GHC and possibly some optimization. Maybe I'm
missing something, though. Is there a list of outstanding bugs
somewhere? I personally know
10 matches
Mail list logo
