creswick:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> wrote:
> > On 6 September 2010 21:57, han wrote:
> >> So the question is: Do you agree that "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL" actually
> >> should have been "Graphics.OpenGL" (or just OpenGL) for wieldiness?
> >
> > I think Graphics.Op
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> On 6 September 2010 21:57, han wrote:
>> So the question is: Do you agree that "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL" actually
>> should have been "Graphics.OpenGL" (or just OpenGL) for wieldiness?
>
> I think Graphics.OpenGL would have sufficed
On 6 September 2010 21:57, han wrote:
> So the question is: Do you agree that "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL" actually
> should have been "Graphics.OpenGL" (or just OpenGL) for wieldiness?
I think Graphics.OpenGL would have sufficed, unless there was
sufficient reason to want to group it with other r
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:57 PM, han wrote:
So the question is: Do you agree that "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL"
actually should have been "Graphics.OpenGL" (or just OpenGL) for
wieldiness? If you don't, what is your reason? I would like to know.
Often, when this topic comes up, someone claims tha
Before we proceed, let's make some points clear.
For example, OpenGL is currently imported via "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL".
With the reasoning that "Graphics.SomeModule" (instead of
"Graphics.Drawing.SomeModule") has no problem ("since we don't really look
for packages based upon the module hierar
On 6 September 2010 10:09, han wrote:
> I think there should be Graphics.Drawing (along with Graphics.Rendering) and
> many graphics packages should go into it.
Why?
> So
> * Graphics.Rendering will contain more technical and rendering-engine-level
> packages (OpenGL, GD, ...)
> * while Graphics
I think there should be Graphics.Drawing (along with Graphics.Rendering) and
many graphics packages should go into it.
So
* Graphics.Rendering will contain more technical and rendering-engine-level
packages (OpenGL, GD, ...)
* while Graphics.Drawing will be for higher-level and user-friendlier
dr