Hi Max, thanks for your suggestion. I also have a not pretty code which
used Text.XML.Light and TH. I am going to rewrite it. HXT by my opinion is
too big.
The question is a requirements. Which correlations exist between Haskell
types and XML-Schema possibilities? How to prepare XML for different
Hi Dmitry,
I've been using HXT and its XmlPickler class for encoding and decoding
between XML - Haskell types. It takes a while to wrap your brain
around the arrows based API for HXT (something I'm still working on)
but it seems to be quite powerful and well maintained.
Also, I've
Like in Keith proposal I need it for working with web-services, maybe Xml
transformations and so on. And I tried to make it by self with a partial
success. To work with xml I only used xml package (Text.XML.Light).
Now I am going to work a little (?) on this task to provide more standard
and
it would be to migrate over to
vanilla haskell+generics is another question
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Olshansky
To: Haskell cafe
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell2Xml
Like in Keith proposal I need it for working with web-services
link to paper: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1.7362
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Olshansky
To: Haskell cafe
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell2Xml
Like in Keith proposal I need it for working with web
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:05, John Lask jvl...@hotmail.com wrote:
the paper:
Scripting XML with Generic Haskell
Frank Atanassow, Dave Clarke and Johan Jeuring
October 14, 2003
describes a translation from XML Schema to Haskell data types (like
dtd2haskell) in generic haskell, I believe
Well, great thanks for interesting links.
But definitely at first I need a time to try to understand what Generic
Haskell and EMGM are.
Does it stronger than Template Haskell? Could it be explained briefly and
simplistic for first impression? Could it be compared with SYB or TH?
Would it be
Hello Dmitry,
Friday, August 7, 2009, 3:04:37 PM, you wrote:
generic programming in haskell generally means SYB-like things and
Generic Haskell (at least i have read description of) was a extended
version of Haskell with built-in support for generic programming. i.e.
those type-specific
Hi Dmitry,
Well, great thanks for interesting links.
But definitely at first I need a time to try to understand what Generic
Haskell and EMGM are.
Generic Haskell (GH) is a language extension implementing datatype-generic
programming features on top of Haskell. It is implemented using a
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Keith Sheppard keiths...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Dmitry,
I too was looking for something like this and came up empty. I
proposed something similar on the haskell_proposals reddit...
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/comments/8zhkx/haxb_and_haxws/
...
Hello all,
I need a convenient tool to generate Haskell types from XML W3C Schema
Definition (xsd) and vice versa - generate instances for Haskell ADT's to
make corresponding XML.
It is just the same that HaXml do with DTD.
I need
- using XSD
- support for unicode
- using xml-attributes as far as
Hello Dmitry,
I too was looking for something like this and came up empty. I
proposed something similar on the haskell_proposals reddit...
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/comments/8zhkx/haxb_and_haxws/
... but I was left with the impression that there isn't much interest.
-Keith
On
12 matches
Mail list logo