On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Daniel
Fischerdaniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 03:32:20 schrieb Fernan Bolando:
What is everybodies expereience in speed difference between C and
interpreted haskell?
That depends on what you do, unsurprisingly. But usually it's huge.
Hi all
thanks to everyone that reviewed my code.
The good news
1. I happy to say that it has become useful enough for me to use it in
some matlab type caluculations. includes transient and dc op
2. The simple pivtoing code I added into the DSP Lu appears to be
useable for this application.
The
Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 03:32:20 schrieb Fernan Bolando:
What is everybodies expereience in speed difference between C and
interpreted haskell?
That depends on what you do, unsurprisingly. But usually it's huge. A factor of
several
hundred is not uncommon, but 10-100 is the normal range (in
daniel.is.fischer:
Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 03:32:20 schrieb Fernan Bolando:
What is everybodies expereience in speed difference between C and
interpreted haskell?
Why are you using hugs?
Hugs is slower than GHCi, which is around 30x slower on average than
GHC, (measured a couple of years
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Fernan Bolando fernanbola...@mailc.netwrote:
Hi all
thanks to everyone that reviewed my code.
The good news
1. I happy to say that it has become useful enough for me to use it in
some matlab type caluculations. includes transient and dc op
2. The simple
