From: haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of John Meacham
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:55:51PM +, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That was indeed my point. Since a compiler is a
substantial program I
would have more confidence it a compiler
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, John Meacham wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:55:51PM +, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That was indeed my point. Since a compiler is a substantial program I
would have more confidence it a compiler that is self-hosting.
Surely you must have tried?
No, there are
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:47:43PM -0500, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Do you use jhc when you develop jhc? I.e., does it compile itself.
For me, this is the litmus test of when a compiler has become usable.
I mean, if even the developers of a compiler don't use it themselves,
why should anyone
Hi John,
Do you use jhc when you develop jhc? I.e., does it compile itself.
For me, this is the litmus test of when a compiler has become usable.
I mean, if even the developers of a compiler don't use it themselves,
why should anyone else? :)
Well, this touches on another issue, and that
Thanks Neil,
That was indeed my point. Since a compiler is a substantial program I
would have more confidence it a compiler that is self-hosting.
Surely you must have tried?
-- Lennart
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Do you use jhc when
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:55:51PM +, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That was indeed my point. Since a compiler is a substantial program I
would have more confidence it a compiler that is self-hosting.
Surely you must have tried?
No, there are extensions that I use in jhc's code base that jhc
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:41:54PM -0800, Philippos Apolinarius wrote:
I discovered a Haskell compiler that generates very small and fast
code. In fact, it beats Clean. It has the following properties:
Excellent. that was my goal ;)
1 --- One can cross-compile programs easily. For instance,
John,
Do you use jhc when you develop jhc? I.e., does it compile itself.
For me, this is the litmus test of when a compiler has become usable.
I mean, if even the developers of a compiler don't use it themselves,
why should anyone else? :)
-- Lennart
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:37 AM, John
Quoth Lennart Augustsson lenn...@augustsson.net,
Do you use jhc when you develop jhc? I.e., does it compile itself.
For me, this is the litmus test of when a compiler has become usable.
I mean, if even the developers of a compiler don't use it themselves,
why should anyone else? :)
Though
If by minority platform you mean platforms that are resource starved,
like some embedded systems, then I would have to agree.
-- Lennart
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Quoth Lennart Augustsson lenn...@augustsson.net,
Do you use jhc when you develop jhc?
Quoth Lennart Augustsson lenn...@augustsson.net,
If by minority platform you mean platforms that are resource starved,
like some embedded systems, then I would have to agree.
Like anything but the platform the compiler developer(s) use. If you
used a platform like that, you would certainly
]
putStrLn (show (xx::Tree))
I hope you can fix it.
--- On Wed, 11/11/09, John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote:
From: John Meacham j...@repetae.net
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Opinion about JHC
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Received: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 1:37 AM
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009
I discovered a Haskell compiler that generates very small and fast code. In
fact, it beats Clean. It has the following properties:
1 --- One can cross-compile programs easily. For instance, here is how I
generated code for Windows:
jhc --cross -mwin32 genetic.hs -o genetic
2 -- It seems to be
1 -- How active is the team who is writing the JHC compiler?
The Team is John and Its not his day job afaik. Lemmih used to work
on it before he forked it into LHC which has since evolved into a
new (GRIN based) backend for GHC [1].
2 -- Is it complete Haskell? The author claims that it is;
14 matches
Mail list logo
