On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:39:32PM +0100, Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
I can see only two options
available to us right now to preserve readability in the fast growing Haskell
community: divide haskell@ into more specific lists (haskell-cafe should
preserve its right to long threads !!!) or ascribe
On 26/09/2007, Devin Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I suppose the above doesn't require a new protocol -- mailing-list +
funny-ass MUA would do.
ITYM funny ass-MUA.
Sorry, I'll go back to lurking. .
--
Jeremy
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[cc-ed to haskell@, as this discussion is about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are four things sent to the haskell list@
1) Calls for papers
2) Annoucements
3) Oleg's stuff (which are really announcements of a library or technique)
4) Off topic stuff
I'm initially only proposing to mop up category
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:00:40PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
in other words, people were meant to subscribe either
to haskell or to haskell+haskell-cafe, and posting to
haskell was meant to be a flag able to raise a topic
briefly over the general din in haskell-cafe.
Do people think that
On 9/23/07, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Rename haskell@ to haskell-announce@, and redirect mails from haskell@
to haskell-announce@ for some period.
Makes sense to me. Seems to reflect the emails I'm actually getting
from the lists in question.
Hi
Forgive me, but I would much prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list.
True, I could unsubscribe now and just browse the mailman archives -
but for posting, I'd have to temporarily re-subscribe, which is awkward.
(Indeed that's the only reason I'm not doing it.)
I believe you can post from
Sorry guys for joining the thread of sinners on haskell@ today. Forgot to check
if guests had not moved to cafe;-)
It is a good example though how insufficient this verbal principles are, since I
have myself raised the need to revise names of the lists here.
On second thought, with rising
in other words, people were meant to subscribe either
to haskell or to haskell+haskell-cafe, and posting to
haskell was meant to be a flag able to raise a topic
briefly over the general din in haskell-cafe.
Do people think that is working?
i don't think it is working anymore. haskell-cafe
Flooding haskell-cafe with extra traffic from haskel@ will lead to
comp.soft-sys.matlab syndrom where few people read anything but their own
postings and discussion is virtually unknown. I can see only two options
available to us right now to preserve readability in the fast growing Haskell
The gmane newsgroups corresponding to haskell mail lists can be found eg at:
http://gmane.org/find.php?list=haskell
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Claus Reinke wrote:
so everything that would be of interest to all haskellers,
including those too busy to follow haskell-cafe, would go to haskell,
everything else would go to haskell-cafe.
but even those topics starting out on haskell are meant
to migrate to haskell-cafe after a few posts at
Hi
I've just replied to another first poster with wrong list. Its
entirely not their fault, but its also probably a bit off-putting that
your very first post gets a (very polite) you got it wrong message.
To steal the reasons and explanations from Ian:
-
pretty much what
Neil Mitchell wrote:
* Rename haskell@ to haskell-announce@, and redirect mails from haskell@
to haskell-announce@ for some period.
I agree. Unless... do some people subscribe to haskell@ (not
haskell-cafe@) and like the existing stuff that's sent there (not all
announcements... I'm not
Hi
I agree. Unless... do some people subscribe to haskell@ (not
haskell-cafe@) and like the existing stuff that's sent there (not all
announcements... I'm not sure if I'd call e.g. Oleg's occasional
demonstrations announcements even)?
There are four things sent to the haskell list@
1)
14 matches
Mail list logo
