Kevin Jardine wrote:
> instead of passing around lists of values with these related types, I
> created a polyvariadic function polyToString...
> I finally figured out how to do this, but it was a bit harder to
> figure this out than I expected, and I was wondering if it might be
> possible to crea
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Kevin Jardine wrote:
>> I had a situation where I had some related types that all had toString
>> functions.
>>
>> Of course in Haskell, lists all have to be composed of values of
>> exactly the same type, so ins
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Kevin Jardine wrote:
> I had a situation where I had some related types that all had toString
> functions.
>
> Of course in Haskell, lists all have to be composed of values of
> exactly the same type, so instead of passing around lists of values
> with these related
I had a situation where I had some related types that all had toString
functions.
Of course in Haskell, lists all have to be composed of values of
exactly the same type, so instead of passing around lists of values
with these related types, I created a polyvariadic function
polyToString so that I
