On 2009-02-14, Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com wrote:
The way you wrote CComplex a, is it possible to write
foreign import ccall somename somename
:: CComplex CDouble - IO CComplex CDouble
Ah, no, I'm afraid not, I misunderstood what you wanted. You do indeed
need to go through CPtr
On 2009-02-03, Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com wrote:
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
A separate library for new types to add to Foreign would be the easiest
way forward. Just put the foreign-c99 package on Hackage?
(...) I
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
A separate library for new types to add to Foreign would be the easiest
way forward. Just put the foreign-c99 package on Hackage?
(...) I could actually have some
arbitrary sized parameter as
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
A separate library for new types to add to Foreign would be the easiest
way forward. Just put the foreign-c99 package on Hackage?
(...) I could actually have some
arbitrary sized parameter as
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
and CLongDoubleComplex? This seems an easy addition
to the standard and would allow binding of a few
interesting libraries, like GSL.
A separate library for new types to add to Foreign would be the
briqueabraque:
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
and CLongDoubleComplex? This seems an easy addition
to the standard and would allow binding of a few
interesting libraries, like GSL.
A separate library for new types to add to
Are there plans to include C99 'complex' type
in Foreign, maybe as CFloatComplex, CDoubleComplex
and CLongDoubleComplex? (...)
A separate library for new types to add to Foreign would be the easiest
way forward. (...)
If it's not true, i.e., I could actually have some
arbitrary sized
