[Haskell-cafe] Re: Low-level high-level languages?

2009-02-16 Thread Jon Fairbairn
Maurí­cio briqueabra...@yahoo.com writes: Hi, I've checked this 'BitC' language (www.bitc-lang.org). It uses some ideas we see in Haskell, although with different realization, and target mainly reliable low level code, like micro-kernels (although I think it could be used anywhere C is

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Low-level high-level languages?

2009-02-16 Thread Alberto G. Corona
http://www.ats-lang.org/ 2009/2/16 Jon Fairbairn jon.fairba...@cl.cam.ac.uk Maurí­cio briqueabra...@yahoo.com writes: Hi, I've checked this 'BitC' language (www.bitc-lang.org). It uses some ideas we see in Haskell, although with different realization, and target mainly reliable low

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Low-level high-level languages?

2009-02-16 Thread Fraser Wilson
What was that stripped-down low-level version of C I saw coming out of ... was it Microsoft Research? C-- or something. Unfortunately, the name appears to be immune to Googling. 2009/2/16 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com http://www.ats-lang.org/ 2009/2/16 Jon Fairbairn

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Low-level high-level languages?

2009-02-16 Thread minh thu
Google doesn't hear you ? Yell louder ! http://www.cminusminus.org/ 2009/2/16 Fraser Wilson blancoli...@gmail.com: What was that stripped-down low-level version of C I saw coming out of ... was it Microsoft Research? C-- or something. Unfortunately, the name appears to be immune to

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Low-level high-level languages?

2009-02-16 Thread Ryan Ingram
C-- is kind of dead; it lives on in spirit as a data type used by the back end of GHC, but there hasn't been much development in C-- as a language proper in a while. LLVM seems to be gaining momentum in that space; Lennart has been posting some experiments with generating LLVM code in Haskell in