First, apologies for not responding earlier. I spent my week at a
conference in Austria. Second, thanks for all the feedback!
I thought I go through some of my thoughts on the issues raised. Just
to try to reiterate the goals of this effort:
* To provide a common, no frills interface between
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does old code that handled these headers stop working, just because it
was looking in the other section, but now needs to check a field
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Daniel Yokomizo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both request and response accept any entity headers and 7.1 (of RFC
2616) says that a valid entity header is an extension header, which
can be any kind of header.
Is wasn't suggesting that other headers be dropped,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of tooting my own
horn, I'll point to the Headers structure in
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:06:43 Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of
Haskell works fine with both the FastCGI and SCGI protocols (There are
libraries floating around for both), I have found them much nicer than
any mod_* web server plugin in general.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
___
Haskell-Cafe
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does old code that handled these headers stop working, just because it
was looking in the other section, but now needs to check a field
dedicated to that header?
Yes, but it would be very sad if we couldn't do common
Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of tooting my own
horn, I'll point to
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:32:07 Chris Smith wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:06:43 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
