Hi,
Nick Bowler wrote:
There is another header, Mail-Followup-To, which tells MUAs to also drop
the To and CC lists.
Interesting. So is it a good idea to use Mail-Followup-To to move a
discussion from one list to another?
To: hask...@haskell.org
CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
On 2010-11-21 08:24 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
If the list were to add a Reply-To: header, but only in the case
where one was not already present, that would seem to me to be ideal.
(None of the internet polemics against Reply-To that I have seen, have
considered this modest
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 08:24 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
If the mailing list replaced Reply-To header it would required
additional effort for responders instead of just pressing reply-to-
all.
If the list were to add a Reply-To: header, but only in the case
where one was not already
If the mailing list replaced Reply-To header it would required
additional effort for responders instead of just pressing reply-to-
all.
If the list were to add a Reply-To: header, but only in the case
where one was not already present, that would seem to me to be ideal.
(None of the
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 15:25 +0100, Arnaud Bailly wrote:
I personnally use most of the time gmail, so I don't have access to a
Reply-To-List feature (or do I?).
I usually do Reply-to-all which I think is as I guess most mailers
remove duplicate mails. Am I right?
Arnaud
As message have the
