Hi Oleg,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36, wrote:
>
> Jose Pedro Magalhaes wrote:
> > From what I understand, you are using a list of integers to encode a path
> to
> > a subterm. This is a practical and lightweight implementation, but less
> > type-safe: it is easy to encode annotations that do no
Jose Pedro Magalhaes wrote:
> From what I understand, you are using a list of integers to encode a path to
> a subterm. This is a practical and lightweight implementation, but less
> type-safe: it is easy to encode annotations that do not correspond to any
> value. Also, it cannot guarantee, with
Hi Oleg,
>From what I understand, you are using a list of integers to encode a path to
a subterm. This is a practical and lightweight implementation, but less
type-safe: it is easy to encode annotations that do not correspond to any
value. Also, it cannot guarantee, with types alone, that every su
Jose' Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> I am writing here to ask suggestions on how to annotate an ast with
> types (or any other information that would be relevant in a compiler
> phase) in Haskell.
There is also a general way of annotating AST post factum, described in
http://okmij.org/ftp/Al
