On 11/06/2011, at 3:42 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 00:36, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
The point is that they *could* have. The fact that they do not has
nothing whatever to do with UNIX. It was a Haskell design decision.
I have this feeling you're
On 10 June 2011 06:43, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 10/06/2011, at 1:11 AM, Erik Hesselink wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 00:36, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
The point is that they *could* have. The fact that they do not has
nothing whatever to do with UNIX. It was a Haskell design decision.
I have this feeling you're looking at it backwards... The question
was whether GHC
Hi
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell thread
and replace its 'stdin' ?
Why do I want this - well I'm using the pcap library and I want to uncompress
data to feed into 'openOffile' (which will take - to designate read from
stdin). Yes I can create a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
If you don't mind being tied to GHC you can use hDuplicateTo from
GHC.IO.Handle [1]. You can also use dupTo
Quoth Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
If you don't mind being tied to GHC you can use hDuplicateTo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:40, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Quoth Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 07:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
File descriptors/file handles are per process, not per thread, on
(almost?) every OS ghc supports. You'll
Thanks
That is what I thought. I'll stick with what I'm doing at present which is to
use temporary files - don't want to get into separate processes which I then
have to co-ordinate.
Cheers
Neil
On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:01, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 07:40, Neil Davies
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Neil Davies wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell thread
and replace its 'stdin' ?
Why do I want this - well I'm using the pcap library and I want to uncompress data to
feed into 'openOffile' (which will take - to designate read
On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:01, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 07:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
File descriptors/file handles are per process, not
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:59, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I understood the OP's question to mean does Haskell allow rebinding
of what _it_ calls standard input, which would be YES for Pop, Ada,
Prolog, and Lisp, just as it is NO for C.
But none of those are Haskell, and neither
On 10/06/2011, at 4:12 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:59, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I understood the OP's question to mean does Haskell allow rebinding
of what _it_ calls standard input, which would be YES for Pop, Ada,
Prolog, and Lisp, just as it is
On 10/06/2011, at 1:11 AM, Erik Hesselink wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:40, Neil Davies semanticphilosop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone out there got an elegant solution to being able to fork a haskell
thread and replace its 'stdin' ?
If you don't mind being tied to GHC you can use
14 matches
Mail list logo
