Ryan Ingram:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This concept of `day-to-day work' is a curious one. Haskell is not a
mature language, and probably shouldn't ever be one.
I see where you are coming from here, but I think that train has
already started and
Jonathan, I think we are going to end up just disagreeing on this
subject, but I'd like to point out the reasons why we disagree.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This concept of `day-to-day work' is a curious one. Haskell is not a
mature language, and
ryani.spam:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This concept of `day-to-day work' is a curious one. Haskell is not a
mature language, and probably shouldn't ever be one.
I see where you are coming from here, but I think that train has
already started
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 01:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
ryani.spam:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This concept of `day-to-day work' is a curious one. Haskell is not a
mature language, and probably shouldn't ever be one.
I see where you are
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 01:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
ryani.spam:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Cast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This concept of `day-to-day work' is a curious one. Haskell is not a
mature language, and probably shouldn't ever be one.
I see where you are
