I completely agree that some way of measuring the potential usefulness
of packages would be great.
To some extent, you can get a measure of the popularity of various
packages in Debian (and probably other Linux distributions have similar
systems). E.g.
Hi,
Yesterday Max complained about documentation for many Haskell modules.
But I found another similar problem with Hackage.
Before coding some Haskell program I try to find most appropriate
libraries, which help me to do task more efficiently. But the problem,
that there are to many libraries
Vasyl Pasternak wrote:
Before coding some Haskell program I try to find most appropriate
libraries, which help me to do task more efficiently. But the problem,
that there are to many libraries with similar functionality (for
example - networking, web servers etc.). And to find the best solution
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:32:33AM +, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Adding a ranking is nice, but a comment lets people add highly
relevant information like this package is good, but doesn't work
properly with Unicode and so forth. Stuff somebody about to try
using the package would *really* want
2009/11/14 Felipe Lessa felipe.le...@gmail.com:
Probably adding markers to the comment area every time a new
version is added is also a nice idea because a problem in the
comment are may be corrected. The marker would serve as a visual
aid that the comment may be outdated.
It would be nice
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Stephen Tetley
stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/14 Felipe Lessa felipe.le...@gmail.com:
Probably adding markers to the comment area every time a new
version is added is also a nice idea because a problem in the
comment are may be corrected. The marker
