Re: [Haskell-cafe] Using IsString with attoparsec
I wrote: >>> I suggest adding the following type-specialized variants to >>> Data.Attoparsec.Char8: >>> >>> (<*.) :: Applicative f => f a -> f ByteString -> f a >>> (<*.) = (<*) >>> >>> (.*>) :: Applicative f => f ByteString -> f a -> f a >>> (.*>) = (*>) Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: >> Sounds reasonable. Send a patch? Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: > Done! It will be in attoparsec-text 0.8.2.0. Fantastic.! Felipe, thanks so much for this patch, and for the IsString instance in attoparsec-text. Regards, Yitz ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Using IsString with attoparsec
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Yitzchak Gale wrote: >> >> I suggest adding the following type-specialized variants to >> Data.Attoparsec.Char8: >> >> (<*.) :: Applicative f => f a -> f ByteString -> f a >> (<*.) = (<*) >> >> (.*>) :: Applicative f => f ByteString -> f a -> f a >> (.*>) = (*>) > > Sounds reasonable. Send a patch? Done! It will be in attoparsec-text 0.8.2.0. Bryan, I don't know how to give you a patch using Mercurial, so I've used 'hg export -r 231 -o ../attoparsec_applicative.hg_export'. The patch is basically the same as attoparsec-text's. Cheers! =) -- Felipe. attoparsec_applicative.hg_export Description: Binary data ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Using IsString with attoparsec
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Yitzchak Gale wrote: > I suggest adding the following type-specialized variants to > Data.Attoparsec.Char8: > > (<*.) :: Applicative f => f a -> f ByteString -> f a > (<*.) = (<*) > > (.*>) :: Applicative f => f ByteString -> f a -> f a > (.*>) = (*>) > Sounds reasonable. Send a patch? ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
[Haskell-cafe] Using IsString with attoparsec
Using the IsString instance for Parser in attoparsec is really nice, but unfortunately, you can't use it out of the box for the most common case. One would like to be able to write parsers in this style: "(" *> stuff <* ")" But the types of *> and <* are too general - there is no way for the type checker to figure out which instance of IsString to use for the discarded parameter. I suggest adding the following type-specialized variants to Data.Attoparsec.Char8: (<*.) :: Applicative f => f a -> f ByteString -> f a (<*.) = (<*) (.*>) :: Applicative f => f ByteString -> f a -> f a (.*>) = (*>) Once attoparsec-text gets its IsString instance, I would add the same thing to Data.Attoparsec.Text, with ByteString replaced by Text. I have been using those for both attoparsec and attoparsec-text, and I find them extremely useful. Thanks, Yitz ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe