-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/2/10 03:33 , Permjacov Evgeniy wrote:
Forth is quite easy to implement, but can it be used as extension
language? Wiki describes it as quite low level...
It's low level but rather easy to build up more complex stuff. It's never
been that
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is well documented and stable ?
There are other ways of adding Haskell as a scripting language -
bundling ghc is not necessary.
It is inacceptable for scripting language, faced to no-programmers.
Such
languages must be as plain and regular, as
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.com wrote:
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is well documented and stable ?
There are other ways of adding Haskell as a scripting language - bundling
ghc is not necessary.
Do tell.
It is inacceptable for scripting
There are other ways of adding Haskell as a scripting language - bundling
ghc is not necessary.
Even the program which is to run the scripts is compiled with GHC?
I am interested to know how you do that.
2010/11/4 Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.com
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is
On 4 Nov 2010, at 17:52, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.com
wrote:
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is well documented and stable ?
There are other ways of adding Haskell as a scripting language -
bundling
ghc is not necessary.
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is well documented and stable ?
There are other ways of adding Haskell as a scripting language -
bundling ghc is not necessary.
I still have not found haskell interpreter, that is written in pure
haskell and has good quality (i.e. stable, written in stable
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a
reasonably simple, yet standartized and wide known language should be
implemented. What such language may be?
R(4/5/6)RS ?
EcmaScript ?
Some other ?
Ehm... Forth? TCL?
Отправлено с iPhone
Nov 2, 2010, в 9:04, Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com написал(а):
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a
reasonably simple, yet standartized and wide
Forth is quite easy to implement, but can it be used as extension
language? Wiki describes it as quite low level...
TCL ... Well, I'll consider it if it have written standart, like RxRS does.
On 11/02/2010 09:31 AM, Miguel Mitrofanov wrote:
Ehm... Forth? TCL?
Отправлено с iPhone
Nov 2, 2010,
I haven't ever used it myself, but I've heard good things about Lua,
which was designed to be an embedded scripting language for applications:
http://www.lua.org/
If you believe the Programming Language Shootout
(http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/) it is pretty fast for a dynamic
Or maybe Lua?
There is already a Lua binding on Hackage.
I've been advised to use it when I was also looking for a scripting language
(and disadvised to use Scheme).
2010/11/2 Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
project
Norman Ramsey has implemented Lua as an extension language for ML,
this included actually writing a Lua interpreter not FFI-ing to the
standard Lua. He has a series of good papers about the mechanics of
exposing the API of an application to the scripting language.
The code itself is available as
I don't understand. Why don't you use Haskell as the scripting language?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com wrote:
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use things
like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user side (600Mo+
for GHC 6.12.3)
2010/11/2 Lennart Augustsson lenn...@augustsson.net
I don't understand. Why don't you use Haskell as the scripting
ehm. I missed something and ghc api is well documented and stable ?
The problem is that haskell is overkill here and it requires esoteric
extensions for some tasks (Rank2Types for reflection, for example). It
is inacceptable for scripting language, faced to no-programmers. Such
languages must be
On 11/02/2010 10:40 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use
things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user
side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)
Isn't there a way to use some stripped-down version of ghc and the base
libraries,
Yves Parès schrieb:
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use
things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user
side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)
Hugs is great for running small Haskell scripts.
___
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Yves Parès schrieb:
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use
things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user
side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)
Hugs is great for running small Haskell scripts.
I
Clojure!
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:31, Miguel Mitrofanov miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
Ehm... Forth? TCL?
Отправлено с iPhone
Nov 2, 2010, в 9:04, Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com написал(а):
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
Quoth Henning Thielemann schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de,
Hugs is great for running small Haskell scripts.
The quotes around scripts are well chosen, since it sounds like
you might be using the word in a different sense of `small program',
vs. the extension language notion of a programmable
Henning Thielemann, Tue, November 2, 2010 6:11:02 AM
Yves Parès schrieb:
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use
things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user
side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)
Hugs is great for running small Haskell
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
The quotes around scripts are well chosen, since it sounds like
you might be using the word in a different sense of `small program',
vs. the extension language notion of a programmable UI.
Haskell's suitability for something
On 2/11/2010 9:05 PM, Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote:
On 11/02/2010 10:40 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use
things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user
side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)
Isn't there a way to use some
Hello Permjacov,
Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 9:04:00 AM, you wrote:
Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a
reasonably simple, yet standartized and wide known language should be
implemented. What
24 matches
Mail list logo
