Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com writes:
There's no need to do any page moving or anything; the new version can
just be pasted in.
Ok, done!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
After conferring briefly with people on IRC (yeah, on a Saturday
morning, who am I
2009/12/4 Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
earlier this year, dons suggested reorganising it and posted a template on
the Haskell wiki:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Deniz Dogan deniz.a.m.do...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/4 Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
earlier this year, dons suggested
On 04/12/2009 01:30, Gwern Branwen wrote:
The changes look fine to me, although I'm a little surprised at all
the {{fact}} tags. (Some of them look very easy to fix, like why
typeclasses were introduced in the first place.)
Yes, they're just placeholders to fill in later. (I'm new to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 00:30, Simon Marlow wrote:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
I'm confused. When I'm logged in to Wikipedia, I see a page that is vastly
different from when I'm not
On 04/12/2009 11:18, Sean Leather wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 00:30, Simon Marlow wrote:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised
mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
I'm confused. When I'm logged in to Wikipedia, I
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:20, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 04/12/2009 11:18, Sean Leather wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 00:30, Simon Marlow wrote:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised
mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 13:11, Max Rabkin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
I'm confused. When I'm logged in to Wikipedia, I see a page that is
vastly
different from when I'm not logged in. I haven't played with Wikipedia in
a
long time, so
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
earlier this year, dons suggested reorganising it and posted a template
on the Haskell wiki:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/WikipediaArticleDesign
I've
marlowsd:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
earlier this year, dons suggested reorganising it and posted a template
on the Haskell wiki:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
marlowsd:
As noted before, the Wikipedia article for Haskell is a disorganised mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_%28programming_language%29
earlier this year, dons suggested reorganising it and posted a template
on
11 matches
Mail list logo
