On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:22:15PM -0400, Cale Gibbard wrote:
The second problem arises from hugs not doing the same thing as ghci
with respect to looking up qualified variable names (that is, those
with the module name specified, in this case, the standard module
Char). You can tell hugs to
Hal:
Char.toUpper and Char.isLower in Chapter 3 seem to be a perennial
stumbling block for Hugs users -- could you suggest that Hugs users
load Char and just say toUpper and isLower instead?
I just added a note about this :). Though the tutorial is mirrored in so
many places by now, I'm
Hello,
I'm trying to get started with Haskell. I must say that as good as the
language must be, the documentation was been a source of frustration.
Only one document actually showed me how to get started (ie. run hugs or
ghci), and I was asked to give out my email address before getting it.
Hi,
I'm sorry to hear that you've been having a hard time finding good
references. From the example you gave, it looks like you're using Yet
Another Haskell Tutorial from http://www.isi.edu/~hdaume/htut/ which
is actually my favourite tutorial.
When using hugs or ghci, you should note that what
Hello Cale,
Thank you for your help.
Cale Gibbard wrote:
From the example you gave, it looks like you're using Yet
Another Haskell Tutorial from http://www.isi.edu/~hdaume/htut/ which
is actually my favourite tutorial.
The tutorial itself is quite good, and I like it. I guess I've had a
long day,
Alright, I have what I believe must be a simple question. As one of the
exercises for the Haskell tutorial I got I have to implement an
alternative to the 'map' function.
This is what I have:
-
my/prompt $ cat Test.hs
module Test
where
my_map p [] = []
my_map p
Try:
module Test where
import Char
...
then you don't have to load it in Hugs. When you load it, I think (could
be wrong, I'm not a big hugs guy) it's clearing the fact that you loaded
Test.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Alright, I have what I believe must be a simple
