This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers.
I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm
not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
On 5/6/09, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 ,
adam vogt wrote:
This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers.
I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm
not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
Just a bit curious then what compiler Brandon was using. I'm using GHC
6.10.2 on AMD64 Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 7, 2009, at 14:03 , Magnus Therning wrote:
adam vogt wrote:
This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers.
I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm
not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
hi
why does this don't work?
test = let a = ()
in 1 `a` 2
regards
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote:
why does this don't work?
test = let a = ()
in 1 `a` 2
Works fine here once I correct your indentation (the in needs to be
indented at least as far as the l in let).
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell]
Oh sorry guys was rlly a stupid indentation mistake
next time i'll post the error message too
thanks
regards
2009/5/6 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH allb...@ece.cmu.edu:
On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote:
why does this don't work?
test = let a = ()
in 1 `a` 2
Works fine here once I
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote:
why does this don't work?
test = let a = ()
in 1 `a` 2
Works fine here once I correct your indentation (the in needs to be
indented at least as far as the l in let).
Really? For me it's enough to have in
