David Leimbach wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Alberto G. Corona
> wrote:
>
>> Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds
>> like
>> a joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick
>> and
>> dirty.
>>
>
> I use it for quick and dirty stuf
On 4 August 2010 21:21, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Is scion still being developed? I have the impression it's dead now. Really
> a shame, I think it has a good solid design and just needs work/polish.
It is: http://github.com/nominolo/scion/network
I changed the architecture to use separate processe
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marc Weber writes:
>
> > Hi Qi,
> >
> > have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python,
> Haskell, etc
> > are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion "Can I do everything possible"
> > is
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds like
> a joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick and
> dirty.
>
I use it for quick and dirty stuff all the time, mainly because what I wa
Tillmann Rendel writes:
> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote::
>> My understanding of tab-completion in IDEs for Java, etc. is that it
>> just displayed every single possible class method for a particular
>> object value, and then did some kind of matching based upon what you
>> typed to narrow down the
Rogan Creswick wrote:
> Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language
> Processing (tokenization, sentence splitting, Named-entity
> recognition, etc...).
Since the role of a general purpose language is relatively
new for Haskell, there are many areas where Haskell is still
an e
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote::
My understanding of tab-completion in IDEs for Java, etc. is that it
just displayed every single possible class method for a particular
object value, and then did some kind of matching based upon what you
typed to narrow down the list, not that it was type-based.
G
Marc Weber writes:
> Excerpts from Ivan Lazar Miljenovic's message of Wed Aug 04 12:37:29 +0200
> 2010:
>> functionality in Emacs.
>
> I know - I patched the py backend for scion. I'm talking about:
>
> node.getParent().getParent().Attributes["value"]
>
> Or (let's talk about a haskell example
Marc Weber writes:
> Hi Qi,
>
> have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc
> are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion "Can I do everything possible"
> is not at all important. You have to ask instead: Can I complete my
> task in reasonable time and with reaso
Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds like a
joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick and
dirty.
2010/8/4 Alberto G. Corona
> Before entering haskell, please read our disclaimer:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-
Before entering haskell, please read our disclaimer:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-June/079044.html
You've been warned
*
*
2010/8/4 Zura_
>
> As already noted here, Haskell is a general purpose language, but you
> should
> take it with a grain of salt.
> For instance, you
As already noted here, Haskell is a general purpose language, but you should
take it with a grain of salt.
For instance, you can nail with a laptop (provided that you hit the place
where a HDD is located), but you prefer a hammer :)
One thing is if you do it only for enjoyment, in this case you ca
Hi Qi,
have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc
are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion "Can I do everything possible"
is not at all important. You have to ask instead: Can I complete my
task in reasonable time and with reasonable runtime performance etc.
On 4 August 2010 10:42, Rogan Creswick wrote:
>
> Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language
> Processing [snip]
This isn't a fault of the language, it just
>
> I have some hope that jvm-bridge can be resurrected to bind to
> OpenNLP, but that's something I've only spent a
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Qi Qi wrote:
>
> Is there anyone happen to come into any tasks that haskell is not able
> to achieve?
Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language
Processing (tokenization, sentence splitting, Named-entity
recognition, etc...). NLTK (python), O
I use Haskell for everything. In fact, I will be approaching my 10
year anniversary of using Haskell as my primary development language
soon.
The only area I have had any trouble with Haskell is doing realtime
music synthesis. And only because the garbage collector is not
realtime friendly. That
qiqi789:
>
> As more I learn haskell, I am more interested in this function
> programming language. I am intended to more focus on haskell than other
> languages like python, Java, or C++. But I am still wonder whether haskell
> can do everyting
> as other languages do, such as python, perl, Java
As more I learn haskell, I am more interested in this function
programming language. I am intended to more focus on haskell than other
languages like python, Java, or C++. But I am still wonder whether haskell can
do everyting
as other languages do, such as python, perl, Java and C++.
Is there a
18 matches
Mail list logo
