[Haskell-cafe] gcc as a portable assembler: tail calls vs trampoline

Hello, everyone, I'm not sure this is the good list for this posting: I plan to write yet another lazy graph reduction machine, using gcc, mainly for fun. My concern right now is about one particular aspect of gcc: the tail calls vs trampoline deathmatch. First some clarifications: - By tail

Re: [Haskell-cafe] gcc as a portable assembler: tail calls vs trampoline

2008/7/1 Robin Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think you should use the -march flag to gcc. Otherwise you are tying the compiler to an ancient version of the x86 instruction set (386). OK, let's try... Done. I used -march=nocona. I couldn't do core2 (not available on my gcc 4.1.2 yet). Did not

Re: [Haskell-cafe] gcc as a portable assembler: tail calls vs trampoline

Did you look at the generated assembly code? Although I don't know anything about GCC, I believe it's easy to let it generate an assembly listing file. Loup Vaillant wrote: 2008/7/1 Robin Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think you should use the -march flag to gcc. Otherwise you are tying the