On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc version there
was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could be a
good idea?)
You could use Homebrew instead. That has a fairly up-to-date version
sounds good to me. where can I find the list of packages (or whatever they
call them in homebrew, formula?) available?
On 12 August 2010 11:49, Benedict Eastaugh ionf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I'd like to use the macports
On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:49, Benedict Eastaugh wrote:
On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc
version there
was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could
be a
good idea?)
You could
On 12 August 2010 12:17, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
sounds good to me. where can I find the list of packages (or whatever they
call them in homebrew, formula?) available?
Homebrew only makes available GHC and the Platform:
On 12 August 2010 12:52, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
On
http://wiki.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/installation
it says:
delete /usr/local/include and/usr/local/lib
So its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it seems.
I thought this was just a recommendation.
--
On 12 Aug 2010, at 14:08, Ozgur Akgun wrote:
On
http://wiki.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/installation
it says:
delete /usr/local/include and/usr/local/lib
So its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it
seems.
I thought this was just a recommendation.
It also says:
On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:52, Hans Aberg wrote:
its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it
seems.
But what's wrong with the binaries listed here:
http://haskell.org/ghc/
Fairly easy to install.
Yes and no; on OSX 10.5.8 it works better to install GHC from the
binary
On 12 Aug 2010, at 20:46, Gaius Hammond wrote:
its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it
seems.
But what's wrong with the binaries listed here:
http://haskell.org/ghc/
Fairly easy to install.
Yes and no; on OSX 10.5.8 it works better to install GHC from the
binary
Dear Cafe,
I wonder who is maintaining the ghc package in macports, and what the
current stategy of doing things is?
http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=namesubstr=ghc (ghc 6.10.4)
Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc version there
was resonably recent (having 2
Seconded.
I've started using the Haskell Platform mainly because the ports
version is out of date.
Unfortunately it keeps getting pulled in as a dependency of something
even though I'm not using it.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Cafe,
I wonder
10 matches
Mail list logo
