Tom Murphy amin...@gmail.com writes:
Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
impolite or unwelcoming.
A greylist could work.
Greylist, as in temporarily refuse a message, and wait for the sending
mail server to retry? I don't see how it would work against
On 24 October 2011 18:15, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Tom Murphy amin...@gmail.com writes:
Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
impolite or unwelcoming.
A greylist could work.
Greylist, as in temporarily refuse a message, and wait for the
Daniel Fischer wrote:
Just for the record, not a newcomer, and has non-spam
messages
Conrad Parker wrote:
There was a recent hotmail exploit, with people reporting their
account sent spam...
No exploit is needed. It is trivial for an impostor to
seem as if he is sending email from someone
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
hey Haskell this is nuts ://xxx.xxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate all newcomers to this list, at least
until they post one non-spam message to the list.
If you need volunteers to do this moderation I'll stick my hand
The GUI list could definitely use this type of moderation.
Tom / amindfv
On Oct 23, 2011 9:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
hey Haskell this is nuts ://xxx.xxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate
I don't think OP realizes that we *avoid* success at all costs.
-deech
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Tom Murphy amin...@gmail.com wrote:
The GUI list could definitely use this type of moderation.
Tom / amindfv
On Oct 23, 2011 9:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
R J
On Monday 24 October 2011, 03:54:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
hey Haskell this is nuts ://xxx.xxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate all newcomers to this list, at least
until they post one non-spam message to the
Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2011, 03:54:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
hey Haskell this is nuts ://xxx.xxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate all newcomers to this list, at least
until they post
On 24 October 2011 10:57, Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fisc...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2011, 03:54:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
hey Haskell this is nuts ://xxx.xxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate all
On Monday 24 October 2011, 05:04:03, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
That suggests a hijacked account.
Looks quite so, cf. Conrad Parker's message.
Such accounts could still be put under moderation.
Yes, that's probably the best.
___
Haskell-Cafe
Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
impolite or unwelcoming.
A greylist could work.
Given the relatively low volume of spam, my vote is for the original
suggestion of first-message-moderated, with the ability to put an address
back on moderation if their
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
hey Haskell check it out http://www.fastnews10i.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:23 AM, R J rj248...@hotmail.com wrote:
hey Haskell check it out http://www.fastnews10i.com
OK, who has the ban hammer?
G
--
Gregory Collins g...@gregorycollins.net
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
hey Haskell this is sick http://www.bestsource10.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
15 matches
Mail list logo
