At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:29:32 +0100,
Eric Y. Kow wrote:
Dear Haskellers,
patch theory is still not defined clearly or rigorously enough for Haskellers
Are the darcs developers familiar with these papers (available on citeseer):
Undo Actions in Collaborative Work, Prakash Knister 1992
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:20:17AM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
Are the darcs developers familiar with these papers (available on citeseer):
Undo Actions in Collaborative Work, Prakash Knister 1992
Undoing Actions in Collaborative Work: Framework and Experience, Prakash
Knister 1994
At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:48:03 +0100,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
I've just had a quick read of
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/prakash92undoing.html
AFAICS this only really deals with the case where there are no
conflicts, and doesn't talk about merging.
AFAIK, the papers do not talking about merging.
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:28:58AM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:48:03 +0100,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
I've just had a quick read of
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/prakash92undoing.html
AFAICS this only really deals with the case where there are no
conflicts, and doesn't
At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:59:11 +0100,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:28:58AM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:48:03 +0100,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
I've just had a quick read of
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/prakash92undoing.html
AFAICS this only really
Dear Haskellers,
Last Friday, I had posted a message asking how the darcs community
could a better job recruiting developers to hack on darcs. Thanks for
all the great responses! I am gratified by the suggestions you have
offered, as well as the recent uptick in community involvement.
The
