On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
allb...@ece.cmu.edu wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 05:20 , Luke Palmer wrote:
obsolete now, will your code still work when they are gone? Will it still
work when the typeclass resolution algorithm is obsoleted by a superior
algorithm
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:20 AM, papa.e...@free.fr wrote:
Simple: the definition of MonadState uses those extensions.
Thanks, yes it helps and explains all. :^)
I suppose then that if -XFlexibleContexts is indeed required by the
standard libraries, it is a safe extension, meaning supported
Hi Luke,
Simple: the definition of MonadState uses those extensions.
[Snip question: Is this extension supported by all compilers]
You should treat all compilers the same way as a universal quantifier in
mathematics. It's not just all the compilers you know about, but all
possible
On Jun 23, 2009, at 05:20 , Luke Palmer wrote:
obsolete now, will your code still work when they are gone? Will it
still work when the typeclass resolution algorithm is obsoleted by a
superior algorithm (I'm looking at you, Oleg! :-)? When Haskell is
obsolete, how hard will it be to port?
