Also some operators are clearly sexist >>=, -> => etc etc. I don´t kmow if the lack of female haskellers is due to this inpudic exhibition of male domination ;)
2010/3/28 Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de> Fraser Wilson <blancoli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm sure there's some theory about fags being unable to use tools and > > stuff. > > It certainly cannot be anything to do with cultural pressure. > > Perhaps it is easy to mistake a male-dominated field for one that > > males are intrinsically good at, but really, have a look at the Y > > chromosome, it does nobody any favours. Gender is hormonal. > > I'd rather look at the Y combinator, which kind of resembles a penis: > > Y = \ > f > -> (\x -> f (x x)) (\x -> > f > (x x)) > > > Greets, > Ertugrul > > > -- > nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex) > http://blog.ertes.de/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
