rocon...@theorem.ca schrieb:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post
suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org
(though you have to subscribe). It doesn't even have to be a patch.
Sure, it could
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post
suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org
(though you have to subscribe). It doesn't even have to be a patch.
Sure, it could be smoother, but there's hardly a
rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post
suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org
(though you have to subscribe). It doesn't even have to be a patch.
Sure, it could be
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 17:48 schrieb rocon...@theorem.ca:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post
suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org
(though you have to subscribe). It doesn't even
2009/1/18 Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de:
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 17:48 schrieb rocon...@theorem.ca:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post
suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:48 PM, rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:
I noticed the Bool datatype isn't well documented. Since Bool is not a
common English word, I figured it could use some haddock to help clarify it
for newcomers.
-- |The Bool datatype is named after George Boole (1815-1864).
--
This is a great effort, but the root of the problem isn't just poor
documentation, but an insistence on some obscure name. How about
renaming Bool to YesOrNoDataVariable? I think this would help novice
programmers a great deal.
It would also make the documentation flow much more naturally:
That's a great start, but coproduct is still pretty scary. Why not refer
to it as OneOrTheOtherButNotBothDataConstructor?
-Nathan Bloomfield
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Sterling Clover s.clo...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a great effort, but the root of the problem isn't just poor
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 18:17 +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:48 PM, rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:
I noticed the Bool datatype isn't well documented. Since Bool is not a
common English word, I figured it could use some haddock to help clarify it
for newcomers.
--
