Naming conventions for compiler options [Was: layout rule infelicity]

2002-05-30 Thread oleg
[redirected to haskell-cafe] Jón Fairbairn wrote: 1. Why -f anyway? It took me ages to work out what -fallow-overlapping-instances meant -- I wondered how fallow could apply to overlapping instances. I believe the authors of GHC followed the naming conventions of GCC, which can be gleaned

Re: Naming conventions for compiler options [Was: layout rule infelicity]

2002-05-30 Thread Ashley Yakeley
At 2002-05-30 16:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Wmissing-protons Compiles BASIC? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

RE: Naming conventions for compiler options [Was: layout rule infelicity]

2002-05-30 Thread Jay Allen
: Re: Naming conventions for compiler options [Was: layout rule infelicity] At 2002-05-30 16:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Wmissing-protons Compiles BASIC? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA