Tom Tobin wrote:
The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license. See:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
It is within the terms of the GPL to link GPL code to a bunch of BSD3 code
as long as you abide by both the GPL and the BSD3
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.
The LGPL is still a copyleft license. Do you still have a problem
with that?
If Pandoc is LGPL,
I wasn't suggesting that pandoc was LGPL, I was probing the other
posters attitudes to copyleft
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
Tom Tobin wrote:
The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license.
See:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
It is within the terms of the GPL to link GPL code to a bunch of BSD3
code as long as you abide by
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Gregory Crosswhite
[..]
If Pandoc is LGPL, then I think that means we are dealing with an entirely
different situation, one in which the library user can choose whatever
license he or she likes for his or her own code as long as any modifications
to the
Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu writes:
That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code; you
still have to release your own code as GPL if you are including any
GPL code.
Not quite true: it means that any code your BSD3 library gets used in
has to have a
2009/12/8 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu writes:
That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code; you
still have to release your own code as GPL if you are including any
GPL code.
Not quite true: it means that any
minh thu not...@gmail.com writes:
I wonder how APIs are covered.
I don't think an API would be covered. The API is the standard way to
use something, if copyright licenses cover usage like this, any
executable will be a derivative of the operating system and (possibly)
the compiler.
Why
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jasper van der Jeugt
jasper...@gmail.com wrote:
Hakyll is a simple static site generator library, mostly aimed at blogs. It
supports markdown, tex and html templates.
It is inspired by the ruby Jekyll program. It has a very small codebase
because it makes
Okay,
You're right. I will change the license info as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Jasper Van der Jeugt
On Dec 8, 2009 6:30 AM, Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jasper van der Jeugt jasper...@gmail.com
wrote: Hakyll is a simp...
I hate to say this, but
Tom Tobin wrote:
I hate to say this, but it looks like you're violating the GPL by not
releasing Hakyll under the GPL, since Pandoc is GPL'd.
Not necessarily.
The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license. See:
10 matches
Mail list logo
