Ketil Malde wrote:
> Robin KAY writes:
>
>> the redirects and ignore the original URLs [2]. Using a "302 Found"
>> redirect instead might produce better results, at least for Google
>
> But the page you point to suggests 302 is discouraged, and says they
> don't help for the other search engines
Robin KAY writes:
> the redirects and ignore the original URLs [2]. Using a "302 Found"
> redirect instead might produce better results, at least for Google
But the page you point to suggests 302 is discouraged, and says they
don't help for the other search engines. Perhaps 'latest' could just
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ryan Newton wrote:
> GHC docs seem to have the problem that newer versions only gradually
> overtake older ones in page rank, resulting in the effect that if one
> uses Google to find library documentation, they may accidentally look
> at an old version. For exam
On 22/07/10 15:33, Ryan Newton wrote:
[snip]
So is the 6.12.2 target accruing pagerank rather than the latest one?
Even if someone links the /latest/ URL? If that's the problem, would
it fix things just to make latest/ a full directory structure in its
own right (a clone rather than redirect)?
